1,267
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Media Bias Fact Check (view source)
Revision as of 17:37, October 27, 2019
, 17:37, October 27, 2019Created page with "'''Media Bias Fact Check''' is a left-wing "fact-checker" owned by Dave Van Zandt which purports to monitor bias in the media. It is similar to Snopes...."
'''Media Bias Fact Check''' is a [[left-wing]] "fact-checker" owned by Dave Van Zandt which purports to monitor [[Media Bias|bias in the media]]. It is similar to [[Snopes]].
Most of Media Bias Fact Check's assessments are wildly inaccurate. For instance, [[Conservapedia]] is placed at the very end of the [[right-wing]] of the [[political spectrum]] (see [[Conservapedia Derangement Syndrome]]). Conservapedia is listed under "Questionable Sources" and described as "border[ing] on hate group status." It is accused of promoting "conspiracies" and "fake news." They claim that it, "is not a credible source on any level or by any known criteria."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservapedia/</ref>
[[Breitbart News]], [[Essay: Why I no longer support Breitbart|which has been criticized by Conservapedia]], is also considered "extreme" and positioned on the [[far-right]] of the political spectrum.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/</ref> The [[globalist]] [[Fox News Channel]] is considered strongly right-wing biased and disreputable,<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/</ref> and even the [[neoconservative]] [[Wall Street Journal]], which has accused YouTuber [[PewDiePie]] of being an [[anti-Semite]],<ref>https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney-severs-ties-with-youtube-star-pewdiepie-after-anti-semitic-posts-1487034533</ref> is considered very biased to the right.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/</ref>
Prager University is considered "propaganda,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prageru/</ref> and [[the Rebel Media|Rebel News]] is considered "biased based on story selection that always favours the right."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-rebel/</ref>
[[Conservative]]s have criticized the liberal "fact-checking" website for being subjective and often outright false.<ref>https://www.politifactbias.com/2017/10/can-you-trust-what-media-biasfact-check.html</ref><ref>https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest/</ref><ref>https://www.wnd.com/2017/02/phony-baloney-the-9-fakest-fake-news-checkers/</ref><ref>https://www.wnd.com/2017/02/phony-baloney-the-9-fakest-fake-news-checkers/</ref> On their "10 Best Fact Checking Sites," they list several objectively false and generally inaccurate left-wing "fact-checkers," including [[PolitiFact]], [[Snopes]], and the Fact Checker by the [[Washington Post]].<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2016/07/20/the-10-best-fact-checking-sites/</ref>
==External Links==
* https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
==References==
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Liberal Deceit]]
Most of Media Bias Fact Check's assessments are wildly inaccurate. For instance, [[Conservapedia]] is placed at the very end of the [[right-wing]] of the [[political spectrum]] (see [[Conservapedia Derangement Syndrome]]). Conservapedia is listed under "Questionable Sources" and described as "border[ing] on hate group status." It is accused of promoting "conspiracies" and "fake news." They claim that it, "is not a credible source on any level or by any known criteria."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservapedia/</ref>
[[Breitbart News]], [[Essay: Why I no longer support Breitbart|which has been criticized by Conservapedia]], is also considered "extreme" and positioned on the [[far-right]] of the political spectrum.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/</ref> The [[globalist]] [[Fox News Channel]] is considered strongly right-wing biased and disreputable,<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/</ref> and even the [[neoconservative]] [[Wall Street Journal]], which has accused YouTuber [[PewDiePie]] of being an [[anti-Semite]],<ref>https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney-severs-ties-with-youtube-star-pewdiepie-after-anti-semitic-posts-1487034533</ref> is considered very biased to the right.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/</ref>
Prager University is considered "propaganda,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prageru/</ref> and [[the Rebel Media|Rebel News]] is considered "biased based on story selection that always favours the right."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-rebel/</ref>
[[Conservative]]s have criticized the liberal "fact-checking" website for being subjective and often outright false.<ref>https://www.politifactbias.com/2017/10/can-you-trust-what-media-biasfact-check.html</ref><ref>https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest/</ref><ref>https://www.wnd.com/2017/02/phony-baloney-the-9-fakest-fake-news-checkers/</ref><ref>https://www.wnd.com/2017/02/phony-baloney-the-9-fakest-fake-news-checkers/</ref> On their "10 Best Fact Checking Sites," they list several objectively false and generally inaccurate left-wing "fact-checkers," including [[PolitiFact]], [[Snopes]], and the Fact Checker by the [[Washington Post]].<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2016/07/20/the-10-best-fact-checking-sites/</ref>
==External Links==
* https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
==References==
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Liberal Deceit]]