Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,716
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 336:
Line 336: + + + +
→"The Church cannot save" is not in the Bible; "Baptism does not save" is not in the Bible; "Born again by faith" is not in the Bible: reply
::More spam. Answer a simple question: Was Abraham saved? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 23:48, 1 November 2019 (EDT)
::More spam. Answer a simple question: Was Abraham saved? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 23:48, 1 November 2019 (EDT)
:::I have a problem with this mode of argument. Some people don't know that the word "Trinity" is not in the Bible. But to say so in isolation of the fact that the doctrine is at least ''discussed'' in the Bible would be captious to say the least toward a learning audience.
:::The words "nature" and "procession" are in the Bible, but not "procession of nature". Are we to assume that if the Trinity doctrine is that the Son and the Holy Spirit proceed from the Father not just in name, nor as creation that it's somehow embarrassing that "procession of nature" "is not in the Bible."? That's what your mode of argument suggests. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 16:30, 2 November 2019 (EDT)
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}