Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 785:
Line 785: − +
→Point three of the analysis: deep indentation to immediately distinguish RobS comments from body of the Points of Analysis response
:Your analysis, above, concluded that the argument is "While baptism qualifies a person for adoption into God's family, it is no guarantee; salvation still must be earned by good works, or at least the sacrificial death of Jesus is insufficient to cleanse one of certain sins." The Bible supports this argument, as seen above in the passages cited from the Bible alone. {{unsigned|User:Dataclarifier}}
:Your analysis, above, concluded that the argument is "While baptism qualifies a person for adoption into God's family, it is no guarantee; salvation still must be earned by good works, or at least the sacrificial death of Jesus is insufficient to cleanse one of certain sins." The Bible supports this argument, as seen above in the passages cited from the Bible alone. {{unsigned|User:Dataclarifier}}
::Holy Spirit = Word of God. This is why tampering with the Holy Spirit is so risky, adding to, taking away, or nullifying. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 23:48, 2 November 2019 (EDT)
:::::Holy Spirit = Word of God. This is why tampering with the Holy Spirit is so risky, adding to, taking away, or nullifying. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 23:48, 2 November 2019 (EDT)
====conclusion: the analysis of the argument is supported ''sola scriptura''====
====conclusion: the analysis of the argument is supported ''sola scriptura''====