Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 796:
Line 796: − +
→Scriptural support for the analysis: added "by your tradition"
:::It's a gospel of grace, not of works.</big> [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 22:51, 2 November 2019 (EDT)
:::It's a gospel of grace, not of works.</big> [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 22:51, 2 November 2019 (EDT)
:::I place my comments here because by context they belong here. You've strung together various verses; most are spoken to the people of God. Roman 2:6 is spoken to lost sinners - people apart from God. By removing my post from its proper context, you are preaching a doctrine of men, '''''rendering the word of God to no effect.''''' 07:19, 3 November 2019 (EST)
:::I place my comments here because by context they belong here. You've strung together various verses; most are spoken to the people of God. Roman 2:6 is spoken to lost sinners - people apart from God. By removing my post from its proper context, you are preaching a doctrine of men, '''''rendering the word of God to no effect.''''' 07:19, 3 November 2019 (EST)
::::I place my original response here because by context it belongs here as my original response to your assertion, but you chose to omit it. You've rejected a fundamental statement of the word of God, '''''rendering the word of God to no effect.''''' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2019 (EST)
::::I place my original response here because by context it belongs here as my original response to your assertion, but you chose to omit it. You've rejected a fundamental statement of the word of God, '''''rendering the word of God to no effect by your tradition.''''' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2019 (EST)