SkipCaptcha
6,434
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 158:
Line 158: + + +
→This should be easy to resolve.
All additional comments directly pertaining to the structure of the main article here and to the sources of information cited in it are welcome here.
All additional comments directly pertaining to the structure of the main article here and to the sources of information cited in it are welcome here.
:Yes and no. The real problem is [[Salvation]]. Look at that article. It's a mess. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 17:48, 5 November 2019 (EST)
:Yes and no. The real problem is [[Salvation]]. Look at that article. It's a mess. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 17:48, 5 November 2019 (EST)
:It can be resolved. The [[Petrine Primacy]] article was resolved. If Wikipedia can have its Protestants, Catholics, Orthodox, etc begin to create an informative article, there is no reason why Conservapedia can't do the same.
:It is just a matter of whether the parties geniunely want to resolve the matter.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 18:48, 5 November 2019 (EST)