Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1,088:
Line 1,088: +
Debate: Infant baptism (view source)
Revision as of 16:44, November 6, 2019
, 16:44, November 6, 2019→More postings on Talk:Infant baptism moved here: added clarifying sub head - "RobSmith comment posted same date 6 Nov 2019 on User talk:Dataclarifier"
The following post was submitted by RobSmith on [[Talk:Infant baptism]] 6 Nov. 2019. It has been moved here, along with RobSmith comment posted same date on [[User talk:Dataclarifier]]. Both are reproduced here verbatim.
The following post was submitted by RobSmith on [[Talk:Infant baptism]] 6 Nov. 2019. It has been moved here, along with RobSmith comment posted same date on [[User talk:Dataclarifier]]. Both are reproduced here verbatim.
===The postings===
===The postings===
====RobSmith comment posted same date 6 Nov 2019 on [[User talk:Dataclarifier]]====
::Note spamming a page with multiple redundant links ([https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Infant_baptism#Debate:_Infant_baptism such as here] with 4 redundant links to Debate: Infant baptism, lowers you Google ranking. Google will penalize you for redundant links. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 11:08, 6 November 2019 (EST)
::Note spamming a page with multiple redundant links ([https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Infant_baptism#Debate:_Infant_baptism such as here] with 4 redundant links to Debate: Infant baptism, lowers you Google ranking. Google will penalize you for redundant links. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 11:08, 6 November 2019 (EST)