Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,703
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 934:
Line 934: − +
Debate: Infant baptism (view source)
Revision as of 17:32, November 6, 2019
, 17:32, November 6, 2019→Suggestion
:::::It's actually a gentle disagreement; I think he thinks he'll ''be heard for his much talking'', whereas the Word of God is quick and powerful. Trust the Word. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 08:22, 5 November 2019 (EST)
:::::It's actually a gentle disagreement; I think he thinks he'll ''be heard for his much talking'', whereas the Word of God is quick and powerful. Trust the Word. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 08:22, 5 November 2019 (EST)
*''instead of limiting your comments on the Talk page to a simple, clearly stated "point-counterpoint" basic doctrinal expression'' - HA! Read the page! What planet are you from? Anyone can see I responded to 20-30 and 50 lines of text with 1 or 2 clearly stated, concise scriptural doctrines.
*''instead of limiting your comments on the Talk page to a simple, clearly stated "point-counterpoint" basic doctrinal expression'' - HA! Read the page! What planet are you from? Anyone can see I responded to 20-30 and 50 lines of text with 1 or 2 clearly stated, concise lines of scriptural doctrines.
*''they think they shall be heard for their much speaking''
*''they think they shall be heard for their much speaking''
*''The Word of God is quick and powerful.''
*''The Word of God is quick and powerful.''