:David, WP uses "copyright violation" to delete objectionable articles without going through the Articles for Deletion process, which is usually rigged against the challenged article anyway but takes some time to complete. The Blaylock article was on WP for ten or more years. There were no challenges to the content. Nor did anyone claim the material was in violation of copyright. I don't see anything there in violation of copyright. Facts can't be copyrighted.[[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] ([[User talk:BHathorn|talk]]) 19:03, 12 November 2019 (EST) | :David, WP uses "copyright violation" to delete objectionable articles without going through the Articles for Deletion process, which is usually rigged against the challenged article anyway but takes some time to complete. The Blaylock article was on WP for ten or more years. There were no challenges to the content. Nor did anyone claim the material was in violation of copyright. I don't see anything there in violation of copyright. Facts can't be copyrighted.[[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] ([[User talk:BHathorn|talk]]) 19:03, 12 November 2019 (EST) |