Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Deceit (view source)

Revision as of 04:32, May 14, 2007

526 bytes added ,  04:32, May 14, 2007
→‎Ward Churchill
Line 537: Line 537:     
:I take it Andy, from reading this thread that you have not noticed my post above.  As you can see I have proposed deletion and replacement of the current article (for the reasons stated).  I trust you will like the new version.  Should be ready soon.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:29, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:I take it Andy, from reading this thread that you have not noticed my post above.  As you can see I have proposed deletion and replacement of the current article (for the reasons stated).  I trust you will like the new version.  Should be ready soon.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:29, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: I read your comments, Horace.  There is nothing about this entry that should be deleted.  The examples are striking, factual, and highly informative.  In most of the examples, there was public deceit followed by liberal support of the deceit.  This is precisely the kind of information that Conservative is going to provide, without the censorship common on Wikipedia.  Feel free to add similar examples of public deceit followed by support of the deceit.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:32, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/159650"

Navigation menu