Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
66 bytes added ,  04:42, May 14, 2007
Line 539: Line 539:     
:: I read your comments, Horace.  There is nothing about this entry that should be deleted.  The examples are striking, factual, and highly informative.  In most of the examples, there was public deceit followed by liberal support of the deceit.  This is precisely the kind of information that Conservative is going to provide, without the censorship common on Wikipedia.  Feel free to add similar examples of public deceit followed by support of the deceit.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:32, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:: I read your comments, Horace.  There is nothing about this entry that should be deleted.  The examples are striking, factual, and highly informative.  In most of the examples, there was public deceit followed by liberal support of the deceit.  This is precisely the kind of information that Conservative is going to provide, without the censorship common on Wikipedia.  Feel free to add similar examples of public deceit followed by support of the deceit.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:32, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
::: OK.  Done.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
634

edits

Navigation menu