Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,281
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 859:
Line 859: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Infant baptism (view source)
Revision as of 15:29, November 18, 2019
, 15:29, November 18, 2019→Authority
:Moving on. Why would somebody ''reject (or "neglect") so great a salvation?'' Perhaps to justify sin? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 02:06, 18 November 2019 (EST)
:Moving on. Why would somebody ''reject (or "neglect") so great a salvation?'' Perhaps to justify sin? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 02:06, 18 November 2019 (EST)
==The issue of "issues"==
Perhaps we need to do a section on the issue of "issues"
*Moses tapped the rock and water issued forth.
*Moses' name literally means ''drawn out'' or issue
*The woman with the issue of blood
*''These words that I speak unto (the issue of my mouth), they are spirit and they are life''.
I'm only opening the can here, but the issue of water through out scripture (for example, ''out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water'') runs throughout scripture. A study of this issue will prove Dataclarifier's use of "water" is always, entirely fleshly and natural, and not based upon any spiritual truth. ''The natural man (and mind) '''cannot''' understand the things of God.'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 10:29, 18 November 2019 (EST)