Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
456 bytes added ,  05:55, May 14, 2007
no edit summary
Line 559: Line 559:     
::: P.S.  Andrew, I see you have now added to example 2.  That's great but it doesn't really excuse your '''censoring''' of my example, does it?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 01:45, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::: P.S.  Andrew, I see you have now added to example 2.  That's great but it doesn't really excuse your '''censoring''' of my example, does it?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 01:45, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: I merely inserted material from our entry on the subject, which you seemed to deny.  As to your claim of a court of law, there were no charges ever brought against the witnesses so your allusion to "a fair hearing" is inapplicable.  Also, you continue to overlook that that no appeal was allowed of the opinion. Note also that the witnesses obtained no personal benefit from their alleged deceit.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:55, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,203

edits

Navigation menu