634
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 561:
Line 561: + + + + + + + +
→Ward Churchill
:: I merely inserted material from our entry on the subject, which you seemed to deny. As to your claim of a court of law, there were no charges ever brought against the witnesses so your allusion to "a fair hearing" is inapplicable. Also, you continue to overlook that that no appeal was allowed of the opinion. Note also that the witnesses obtained no personal benefit from their alleged deceit.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:55, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
:: I merely inserted material from our entry on the subject, which you seemed to deny. As to your claim of a court of law, there were no charges ever brought against the witnesses so your allusion to "a fair hearing" is inapplicable. Also, you continue to overlook that that no appeal was allowed of the opinion. Note also that the witnesses obtained no personal benefit from their alleged deceit.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:55, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
::: It still rather leaves Mr. Freud out in the cold, doesn't it?
::: Sorry, you'll have to explain what you mean when you say that no appeal was allowed. Do you mean that the court refused a leave application? If so, so what? It happens all the time.
::: I have already dealt with your point about personal benefit to the witnesses.
::: I never suggested that there were charges against the witnesses. The court just found that they lied. It's pretty simple. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 02:18, 14 May 2007 (EDT)