SkipCaptcha
21
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Added Tulsi's CFR membership, endorsements from conservative media personalities
She is a supporter of the [[authoritarian]] [[Green New Deal]] and [[Medicare for All]] bills and has won the coveted [[David Duke]] endorsement.<ref>https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-david-duke-endorse-bds-israel-ilhan-omar-west-bank-boycott-1318365</ref> Gabbard has been criticized for [[homophobic]] remarks.<ref>https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tulsi-gabbard-homophobic-remarks_us_5c3a6030e4b01c93e00a5952</ref>
She is a supporter of the [[authoritarian]] [[Green New Deal]] and [[Medicare for All]] bills and has won the coveted [[David Duke]] endorsement.<ref>https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-david-duke-endorse-bds-israel-ilhan-omar-west-bank-boycott-1318365</ref> Gabbard has been criticized for [[homophobic]] remarks.<ref>https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tulsi-gabbard-homophobic-remarks_us_5c3a6030e4b01c93e00a5952</ref>
==CFR Membership==
Tulsi Gabbard held a 5-year Term membership, with the Council on Foreign Relations<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/Council_on_Foreign_Relations</ref>, which expired on July 1, 2019. In an interview with big Tulsi advocate, Niko House, in March 2019, Tulsi answers questions regarding her membership with the CFR, that went viral on social media earlier this year, without ever touching on the traditional role of the Council in selecting each elected President’s Cabinet<ref>https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25475-some-of-trump-s-picks-have-troubling-links-to-globalism-cfr</ref>, including heads of National Security, CIA Director, Department of Defense heads, Justice, and Treasury Secretary, key Ambassador positions, and some Supreme Court appointments, from its own members.<ref>https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3582/CFR-Members-And-Bilderberg-Attendees-Appointed-By-Donald-Trump-Taken-from-the-CFR-membership-and-Bilderberg-participant-lists.aspx</ref> Tulsi’s campaign message is based on the pretention that the U.S. President dictates to the CFR, America’s foreign policy, and that therefore Tulsi Gabbard will end Middle East and regime-change wars, based on Presidential/Constitutionally elected authority alone, without letting on that the opposite appears likely true – that the President is a figurehead, who executes the orders of the CFR and other shadow secret societies such as Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission.<ref>http://libertygalaxy.com/cfr-bilderberg-in-trump-admin/</ref> Tulsi’s main support comes from uninformed and easily deceived Progressive Democrats, whose source of info on the CFR is generally limited to what they read on Wikipedia and in mainstream media sources including the Guardian and Intercept as their primary news sources. Their sources describe the Council as a benign advisory think tank that compliments the elected President’s foreign policies.<ref> https://youtu.be/2jArVljkZy4</ref>
==Tulsi claims she’s revealing a new 9/11 Secret==
On 11 September 2019 she stated that "[[Al Qaeda]] Is Stronger Now Than They Were on [[9/11]]".<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/09/11/tulsi-gabbard-al-qaeda-is-stronger-now-than-they-were-on-9-11/</ref> What if Tulsi is only superficially antiwar however, but her real mission is electing Tulsi Gabbard? Is Tulsi Gabbard promoting a limited hangout designed to keep the public confused about who caused 9/11 and why? Tulsi repeats the commonly accepted official narrative – “9/11 was caused by Al Qaeda hijackers”, adding her new secret revelation of Saudi Arabia's involvement as the masterminds who planned it all, and should be held accountable, compensating the victims. Tulsi conveniently leaves out suspected Mossad and CIA involvement. What’s Tulsi’s agenda here? Since President Trump protects and arms Saudi Arabia, Tulsi pretends Trump’s a willing servant of the Saudis, but never acknowledging who ordered him to do it, and who the Saudis are serving as well. By Tulsi demonizing the Saudis, she indirectly attacks Trump as Saudi Arabia's bitch.<ref>https://www.zerohedge.com/political/httpstomluongome20190921gabbard-slams-trump-saudi-arabia</ref> Why doesn’t Tulsi name the complete Middle East cabal, including Israel, Mossad, CIA, NATO allies, along with Saudi Arabia, and by who’s authority they all ultimately serve? What if the truth is President Trump is Lord Rothschild’s bitch, but so are the Saudis, Israel, CIA, NATO, Mossad and all the others? Why doesn’t Tulsi reveal the complete truth of your situation? Why doesn’t conservative media, including Fox's Tucker Carlson, call her out for it? If this doesn’t fit the definition of a limited hangout, then what is it? The way to understand Tulsi however, is to understand she's a politician of contradictions, who regularly flip-flops her position. She demands compensation for 9/11 victims from Saudi Arabia, to embarrass President Trump, but doesn't bother showing up to vote for a bill to actually compensate 9/11 Victims? Tulsi Gabbard is one of the just NINE Democrats in the House to miss the vote on HR 1327 “Never Forget the Heroes” Permanent Authorization of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund Act.<ref>http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll474.xml</ref>
<ref>https://youtu.be/N6IxKUeNQlk</ref>
==Foreign Policy Aligned with Quincy Institute==
Tulsi Gabbard’s anti-interventionist foreign policy initiatives appear aligned with the new Washington, DC based think tank – The Quincy Institute, funded with seed money from George Soros and Charles Koch.<ref>http://www.europereloaded.com/new-soros-koch-funded-think-tank-claims-to-oppose-us-forever-war-the-tulsi-effect/</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/08/27/why-are-george-soros-charles-koch-collaborating-us-bashing-think-tank/</ref><ref>https://www.thenation.com/article/quincy-institute-responsible-statecraft-think-tank/</ref>
==Appearances on Fox News, David Duke, Richard Spencer, Steve Bannon Endorsements==
Per the Nexis database, Tulsi Gabbard made 20 appearances on Fox News while President Obama was in office.<ref>https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/article/2019/nov/21/looking-back-tulsi-gabbards-fox-news-presence-obam/</ref>. This doesn't include instances when she was mentioned on Fox or featured in video clips played on air.<ref>https://www.trackingtulsi.com/alt-right-support</ref> Suggesting that David Duke, Richard Spencer, or Steve Bannon however are endorsing Tulsi, will have practically zero effect on conservative Trump supporters, who don't identify with these individuals. Many Democrats ignorantly assume all Trump supporters are rednecks and racists, who exclusively watch Fox News as their sole news source, shop at Walmart, and drive a pickup with a gun rack, as Tulsi's possible choice for choosing Fox. Democrats and the Liberal media, forced the KKK/Alt-Right label on Trump and his supporters, and now on Tulsi Gabbard too, for associating with Fox, whether it has any basis in truth or fiction, other than they're insisting it does.<ref>https://youtu.be/DeK-f3_7Wv4</ref> If Tulsi is trying to attract conservative voters and Trump supporters to her campaign, picking up endorsements from former KKK member David Duke, Alt-Right spokesman Richard Spencer, or activist Steve Bannon, is practically meaningless for conservatives if they don't identify with them. Most Trump supporters have come to realize that Fox News is controlled opposition, an anti-Trump organization, backstabbing the President every chance they get. They largely reject Fox News as fake. Fox News promoting Tulsi Gabbard isn’t going to attract Trump supporters to Tulsi. Tulsi serves Democrat Party agenda. She’s likely appealing to Trump supporters as a source for campaign financing, but won’t fulfill any of her conservative campaign promises, since she’s running as a Democrat.
==Position on Abortion==
==Position on Abortion==