368
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 295:
Line 295: + + + +
→Eternal Universe?
:As for the "misunderstanding", perhaps (and I'm speculating here) the editor who put in the bit about thermodynamics is arguing that the 2nd law indicates that the universe had a beginning (with which you agree) and that this could only be by a supernatural creation. Thus putting those two points together, the 2nd law points to a supernatural creation. This without bringing "increasing disorder" into the equation.
:As for the "misunderstanding", perhaps (and I'm speculating here) the editor who put in the bit about thermodynamics is arguing that the 2nd law indicates that the universe had a beginning (with which you agree) and that this could only be by a supernatural creation. Thus putting those two points together, the 2nd law points to a supernatural creation. This without bringing "increasing disorder" into the equation.
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:30, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:30, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
A beginning? Yes.
A supernatural beginning? No way of knowing --> pointless speculation --> not science.
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]