Changes

In [[Keynesian]] economic theory, each new job created adds an additional overall average of seven-tenths (0.7) of one job. It's called "the multiplier effect", and is the basis for [[Stimulus]] spending. In the category of manufacturing jobs, each new manufacturing job creates an additional 2.5 service sector jobs. Since passage of [[NAFTA]] in 1996 and granting Most Favored Nation trade status to [[China]] in 2002, the exact opposite of the Keynesian multiplier has occurred - each multi-national corporate employer that moved 50,000 jobs from America to China, Indonesia, and elsewhere created the loss of an additional 125,000 service sector jobs. Whole cities have been wiped out and the [[middle class]] hollowed out. This was no accident - it has been the policy of [[globalism|global elitists]], lobbyists, their multinational corporate clients and paid-off politicians - [[technocrat]]s who imagine themselves qualified to "equalize" global distribution of wealth and poverty by limiting and reigning in the productive capacity of the American people. The destruction of the U.S. industrial and manufacturing base is exactly why the wealth gap has exploded in the past 30 years. In the battle for higher wages for American workers, Democrats sided with foreign workers against American working families.   

In [[Keynesian]] economic theory, each new job created adds an additional overall average of seven-tenths (0.7) of one job. It's called "the multiplier effect", and is the basis for [[Stimulus]] spending. In the category of manufacturing jobs, each new manufacturing job creates an additional 2.5 service sector jobs. Since passage of [[NAFTA]] in 1996 and granting Most Favored Nation trade status to [[China]] in 2002, the exact opposite of the Keynesian multiplier has occurred - each multi-national corporate employer that moved 50,000 jobs from America to China, Indonesia, and elsewhere created the loss of an additional 125,000 service sector jobs. Whole cities have been wiped out and the [[middle class]] hollowed out. This was no accident - it has been the policy of [[globalism|global elitists]], lobbyists, their multinational corporate clients and paid-off politicians - [[technocrat]]s who imagine themselves qualified to "equalize" global distribution of wealth and poverty by limiting and reigning in the productive capacity of the American people. The destruction of the U.S. industrial and manufacturing base is exactly why the wealth gap has exploded in the past 30 years. In the battle for higher wages for American workers, Democrats sided with foreign workers against American working families.   

51% of registered voters say it is likely that senior [[law enforcement]] officials broke the law in an effort to stop Donald Trump from winning the presidency. 36% consider high-level law breaking by U.S. law enforcement unlikely, with 13% not sure.<ref>[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/october_2019/voters_still_suspect_high_level_crimes_against_trump_but_doubt_anyone_will_pay]</ref>  Dr. Robert Epstein of the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology testified before Congress that [[Google]] bias and election meddling shifted "between 2.6 million and up to 10.4 million votes" to [[Hillary Clinton]] in the [[2016 presidential election]].<ref>https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/08/psychologist-google-generated-at-least-2-6-million-votes-for-hillary.php</ref>  

There is a an [[establishment]] in the United States that [[President Dwight Eisenhower]] called the [[military industrial complex]]; today it is referred to  as the [[deep state]].  It is a conglomeration of governmental law enforcement and intelligence agencies, [[Wall Street]], [[Big Tech]] and defense contractor entities.  They wield enormous power.  51% of registered voters say it is likely that senior governmental [[law enforcement]] [[civil servants]] broke the law in an effort to stop Donald Trump from winning the presidency. Only 36% consider high-level law breaking by U.S. law enforcement unlikely, with 13% not sure.<ref>[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/october_2019/voters_still_suspect_high_level_crimes_against_trump_but_doubt_anyone_will_pay]</ref>  Dr. Robert Epstein of the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology testified before Congress that [[Google]] bias and election meddling shifted "between 2.6 million and up to 10.4 million votes" to [[Hillary Clinton]] in the [[2016 presidential election]].<ref>https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/08/psychologist-google-generated-at-least-2-6-million-votes-for-hillary.php</ref>  

In February 2020 the Democrat [[impeachment sham]] backfired, coupled with the Democratic party establishment's election rigging in the Iowa Caucus to thwart Bernie Sanders leading to the highest Approval Ratings of President Trump's presidency.

In February 2020 the Democrat [[impeachment sham]] backfired, coupled with the Democratic party establishment's election rigging in the Iowa Caucus to thwart Bernie Sanders leading to the highest Approval Ratings of President Trump's presidency.