Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,353
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 187:
Line 187: − + + + + + + +
→Also ran
Unfortunately, the nation was deprived of the wisdom, experience, and foresight of this illustrious group of leaders. Under [[FEC]] regulations, funds raised by this group can be poured into other activities. Politicians have exempted themselves from disclosure requirements mandatory for all other non-profit entities. For example, funds raised for the Stacy Abrams for President fund can be re-channeled into the Stacy Abrams for Senate fund. If a private sector entity were to raise money for one cause, and uses it for another cause, that is considered [[fraud]].
Unfortunately, the nation was deprived of the wisdom, experience, and foresight of this illustrious group of leaders. Under [[FEC]] regulations, funds raised by this group can be poured into other activities. Politicians have exempted themselves from disclosure requirements mandatory for all other non-profit entities. For example, funds raised for the Stacy Abrams for President fund can be re-channeled into the Stacy Abrams for Senate fund. If a private sector entity were to raise money for one cause, and uses it for another cause, that is considered [[fraud]].
The Democrat 2020 field of the Best and the Blightest. Most challengers were [[anti-constitutionalist]]s.
The Democrat 2020 field of the Best and the Blightest. Most challengers were [[anti-constitutionalist]]s who opposed the right to life, liberty, work, and pursuit of happiness, the right to keep and bear arms, the right to be free of direct taxes or taxes on net worth, and oppose other [[Constitutional]] limitations on government and guarantees of personal freedoms, including [[free speech]] and [[religion]]. Trillions have become the new Billions. The candidates are in a spending arms race costing Trillions, promising goodies and free stuffs.<ref>https://arcve.is/CqwIC</ref><ref>https://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-and-ukraine-56988171129</ref> Most claim Democrats have a "human right" to the fruits of other people's labor to pay for their healthcare, tuition and other alleged "freebies."<ref>https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/03/no-dont-right-free-health-care-neither-anyone-else/</ref> Progressive Democrats stand by their record of government compulsion, Obamacare, No School Choice mandating black children to failing [[public school]]s and other restrictions on personal choice and freedom.
Virtually all candidates are in the pockets of rich multinational corporations who have benefited from trade deals with [[China]] and [[Mexico]], facilitating the loss of American jobs and hemorrhaging of American wealth to the developing world, bilking American consumers with cheap manufactured goods. The [[climate change]] agenda has been used to shut down American industry on [[environmental]] grounds and ship American manufacturing jobs abroad in the name of "leveling the playing field." The result has been the destruction of the American [[middle class]].
Many candidates have enthusiastically embraced the "[[science]]" behind the [[Green New Deal]], making [[War on science|the unscientific claim]] that slave reparations, Medicare for All, and a [[UBI|universal basic income]] will lower global temperatures by 2 degrees Celsius; its author, Rep. [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]], suggested those top contenders who believe in and have sponsored the climate crisis agenda have the "intelligence of a sea sponge."<ref>https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/13/ocasio-cortez-12-year-climate-literal/</ref> Many also embrace the [[Stalinist]] War of Hamburgers and support a tax on America's beef-eating habits to reduce cow methane emissions.
The presidential candidates, particularly the Democrats, are unusually advanced in age for politicians.<ref>York, Byron (August 11, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/why-is-the-presidential-field-so-old Why is the presidential field so old?] ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved August 11, 2019.</ref> The Democrat presidential candidates frequently used profane language as a campaign strategy.<ref>Simonson, Joseph (September 14, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/how-the-f-do-i-become-president-democrats-adopt-swearing-as-a-campaign-strategy How the f--k do I become president? Democrats adopt swearing as a campaign strategy]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 15, 2019.</ref> The Iranian mullahs, the largest state sponsors of terrorism who by mid-2019 executed 110 people, including children,<ref>https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14727/iran-democrat-presidential-debates</ref> and the Chinese Communist Party poised to squash the first democracy movement in China in 30 years, are very hopeful and enthusiastic about the prospect of a Democratic party president.
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;"
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;"