SkipCaptcha
35,519
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + +
Debate:Should Susan Collins win re-election in 2020? (view source)
Revision as of 23:17, April 9, 2020
, 23:17, April 9, 2020→No, she shouldn't be re-elected
=No, she shouldn't be re-elected=
=No, she shouldn't be re-elected=
==Pro-abortion record==
Since [[Susan Collins]] has had a long [[pro-abortion]] record in the Senate, principled [[pro-lifers]] have reasons to object to her being re-elected, especially with her recent vote against banning [[late-term abortion]].<sup>[https://www.lifenews.com/2020/02/25/here-are-the-two-republicans-who-voted-against-banning-late-term-abortions/]</sup> While it's true that Collins did vote for the [[Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act]] in 2019 and 2020, voted to confirm Kavanaugh, and currently does have a greater rating from the [[NRLC]] than the [[NARAL]] (likely due to confirming Trump-appointed pro-life judges),<sup>[https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/evaluations/379/susan-collins]</sup> she certainly isn't considered [[pro-life]] due to her record on most legislation. --[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]<sup>'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|Your reminder that Biden committed quid pro joe]]'''''</sup> 19:17, 9 April 2020 (EDT)
=(Miscellaneous points to add here)=
=(Miscellaneous points to add here)=