nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 251:
Line 251: + + + + + + + +
Copyright pictures
Interestingly, I addressed this (sadly widespread) myth in the article itself (it's also the reason why I said 100 year old books are bad sources), so if he would just have taken the time to actually read the article...
Interestingly, I addressed this (sadly widespread) myth in the article itself (it's also the reason why I said 100 year old books are bad sources), so if he would just have taken the time to actually read the article...
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]
:Response in point form:
:* There being other such pictures doesn't justify these.
:* If you had brought others to my attention, I would have done the same to them. I'd invite you to now except that I gather that you are no longer around.
:* It was not because of the pictures themselves that I started questioning this; it was solely because of the copyright issue.
:* I don't know where CPWebmaster made that comment that you attribute to him; I haven't seen it, and it certainly wasn't in the edit comment for the deletion.
:As no evidence was forthcoming that there was permission to use the images, I have now deleted them from the article.
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:38, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
== transitional fossil? ==
== transitional fossil? ==