Changes

Liberals have traditionally avoided legislation and the consent of the governed to bring about social change, and have focused on ''judicial fiat'' law to impose a [[cultural Marxist]] agenda, [[abortion]] and [[same-sex "marriage"]] being only two of dozens of obvious examples.  Liberal judges, under a belief in a "[[Living Constitution]]", feel that they can by-pass elected legislators and "legislate from the bench" or write law themselves.

Liberals have traditionally avoided legislation and the consent of the governed to bring about social change, and have focused on ''judicial fiat'' law to impose a [[cultural Marxist]] agenda, [[abortion]] and [[same-sex "marriage"]] being only two of dozens of obvious examples.  Liberal judges, under a belief in a "[[Living Constitution]]", feel that they can by-pass elected legislators and "legislate from the bench" or write law themselves.

In 2011 for example, California federal judge Vaughn Walker, who exposed his true liberal colors upon coming out as homosexual and thus ended up in conflict of interest in the matter, illegally overturned a citizen's referendum which passed overwhelmingly amending the state constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman before he subsequently retired from the bench. California [[Attorney General]] [[Kamala Harris]], for the first time in California history, refused to defend the voter's referendum in Appeals Court, resulting in the "legalization" of gay marriage in California ''against'' the will of the voters and without any action by the legislature.<ref>[https://pjmedia.com/election/6-reasons-to-oppose-nanny-state-tyrant-kamala-harris-in-2020/ 6 Reasons to Oppose Nanny State Tyrant Kamala Harris in 2020], BY TYLER O'NEIL , PJ Media, JANUARY 21, 2019.</ref> In another example, a court allowed an abortion clinic without a license from the state health department in Mayor [[Pete Buttigieg]]'s hometown to remain open, abiding by the wishes of liberals.<ref>Leventis Lourgos, Angie (August 6, 2019). [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-south-bend-abortion-clinic-20190806-2glq5hlgyfejvbvhbk2dknhbme-story.html South Bend at center of abortion debate as unlicensed clinic supported by Mayor Pete Buttigieg is allowed to open via court injunction]. ''Chicago Tribune''. Retrieved September 15, 2019.</ref>

In 2011 for example, California federal judge Vaughn Walker, who exposed his true liberal colors upon coming out as homosexual and thus ended up in [[conflict of interest]] in the matter, illegally overturned a citizen's referendum which passed overwhelmingly amending the state constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman before he subsequently retired from the bench. California [[Attorney General]] [[Kamala Harris]], for the first time in California history, refused to defend the voter's referendum in Appeals Court, resulting in the "legalization" of same-sex "marriage" in California ''against'' the will of the voters and without any action by the legislature.<ref>[https://pjmedia.com/election/6-reasons-to-oppose-nanny-state-tyrant-kamala-harris-in-2020/ 6 Reasons to Oppose Nanny State Tyrant Kamala Harris in 2020], BY TYLER O'NEIL , PJ Media, JANUARY 21, 2019.</ref> In another example, a court allowed an abortion clinic without a license from the state health department in Mayor [[Pete Buttigieg]]'s hometown to remain open, abiding by the wishes of liberals.<ref>Leventis Lourgos, Angie (August 6, 2019). [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-south-bend-abortion-clinic-20190806-2glq5hlgyfejvbvhbk2dknhbme-story.html South Bend at center of abortion debate as unlicensed clinic supported by Mayor Pete Buttigieg is allowed to open via court injunction]. ''Chicago Tribune''. Retrieved September 15, 2019.</ref>

Far-left courts have increasingly advanced personhood rights for animals while continuing to deny the personhood of the [[unborn]].<ref>Horowitz, Daniel (November 8, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/us-courts-make-animals-humans/ Could US courts make animals into humans?] ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved November 9, 2019.</ref>

Far-Left activist courts have increasingly advanced "personhood rights" for animals while continuing to deny the personhood of the [[unborn]].<ref>Horowitz, Daniel (November 8, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/us-courts-make-animals-humans/ Could US courts make animals into humans?] ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved November 9, 2019.</ref>

===Attack on national sovereignty===

===Attack on national sovereignty===