| Line 856: |
Line 856: |
| | | | |
| | A Harris Poll commissioned by [[GLAAD]] shows that U.S. adults are increasingly uncomfortable with [[LGBT]] issues — with Millennials ages 18 – 34 leading this shift. The number of non-LGBT adults ages 18 – 34 who are uncomfortable with learning a family member is LGBT rose from 24% at the end of the Obama era in 2016 to 36% in 2018. The number of Millennials uncomfortable with the idea of their children having a lesson on LGBT history at school rose from 27% to 39% during that same time. The number of Millennials that GLAAD counts as “allies” — people who are comfortable with the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[progressivism]] — dropped from 62% in 2016 to 45% in 2018.<ref>https://www.christianpost.com/news/millennials-gen-z-growing-uncomfortable-lgbt-movement-survey.html</ref> A fake news poll conducted by the [[Soros]]-funded, [[gay]] centered "[[Human Rights Campaign]]" claims that 98% of [[heterosexual|straight]] [[male]]s refuse to date a [[transgender]] allegedly because of "[[hate]]."<ref>https://ucf.forums.rivals.com/threads/are-you-in-the-98-of-hate.76324/</ref> | | A Harris Poll commissioned by [[GLAAD]] shows that U.S. adults are increasingly uncomfortable with [[LGBT]] issues — with Millennials ages 18 – 34 leading this shift. The number of non-LGBT adults ages 18 – 34 who are uncomfortable with learning a family member is LGBT rose from 24% at the end of the Obama era in 2016 to 36% in 2018. The number of Millennials uncomfortable with the idea of their children having a lesson on LGBT history at school rose from 27% to 39% during that same time. The number of Millennials that GLAAD counts as “allies” — people who are comfortable with the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[progressivism]] — dropped from 62% in 2016 to 45% in 2018.<ref>https://www.christianpost.com/news/millennials-gen-z-growing-uncomfortable-lgbt-movement-survey.html</ref> A fake news poll conducted by the [[Soros]]-funded, [[gay]] centered "[[Human Rights Campaign]]" claims that 98% of [[heterosexual|straight]] [[male]]s refuse to date a [[transgender]] allegedly because of "[[hate]]."<ref>https://ucf.forums.rivals.com/threads/are-you-in-the-98-of-hate.76324/</ref> |
| − | | + | [[File:Annotation 2019-05-14 083100.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Tightening [[illegal immigration]] has benefited Black teenagers more than any other group.<br>''Source: Federal Reserve Board'']] |
| | Another 2019 mid-Summer poll found that only 36% of Likely U.S. Voters favored a [[single-payer]] health care system where the federal government provides coverage for everyone. 47% are opposed. Among all voters 64% expect their personal taxes to go up if a single-payer health care system were adopted, 6% say their taxes will go down, while 17% think they will remain about the same and 12% are undecided.<ref>[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law_aug07 Health Care Law], ''Rasmussen Reports'', August 07, 2019.</ref> | | Another 2019 mid-Summer poll found that only 36% of Likely U.S. Voters favored a [[single-payer]] health care system where the federal government provides coverage for everyone. 47% are opposed. Among all voters 64% expect their personal taxes to go up if a single-payer health care system were adopted, 6% say their taxes will go down, while 17% think they will remain about the same and 12% are undecided.<ref>[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law_aug07 Health Care Law], ''Rasmussen Reports'', August 07, 2019.</ref> |
| | | | |
| | A Harvard/Harris Poll conducted in the Summer of 2019 revealed that 69 percent of swing [[voter]]s said they are somewhat unlikely or very unlikely to support a [[2020 presidential candidate]] that supports opening the U.S.-Mexico border to more [[illegal]] and [[legal]] immigration. Overall, about 64 percent of registered voters said they would be more unlikely to support a 2020 presidential candidate that backs increasing illegal and legal immigration to the country — including about 63 percent of [[Generation X]] voters, 45 percent of [[Democrat]]s, and 66 percent of voters who describe themselves as “[[moderate]].”<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/08/05/poll-swing-voters-hugely-oppose-2020-democrats-promising-more-immigration/</ref> Even among Hispanic voters and black Americans, increasing immigration was the second most unpopular position a 2020 presidential candidate could take — just after increasing taxes to pay for social programs. Likewise, voters are nearly unanimously opposed to giving illegal aliens the right to vote, as some left-wing communities have implemented. 85 percent said they oppose such a policy, including 80 percent of Democrat voters, 86 percent of swing voters, 75 percent of self-described “liberals,” 77 percent of black Americans, and 73 percent of Hispanic voters. Only 15 percent of Americans said they support giving illegal aliens the right to vote in U.S. elections.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/04/poll-increasing-immigration-giving-illegals-right-to-vote-most-unpopular-2020-political-positions/</ref> A Fall poll showed 72% of all voters opposed to allowing illegal aliens to obtain driver's licenses, including 74 percent of swing voters.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/17/poll-3-in-4-swing-voters-oppose-democrats-drivers-licenses-for-illegal-aliens/</ref> | | A Harvard/Harris Poll conducted in the Summer of 2019 revealed that 69 percent of swing [[voter]]s said they are somewhat unlikely or very unlikely to support a [[2020 presidential candidate]] that supports opening the U.S.-Mexico border to more [[illegal]] and [[legal]] immigration. Overall, about 64 percent of registered voters said they would be more unlikely to support a 2020 presidential candidate that backs increasing illegal and legal immigration to the country — including about 63 percent of [[Generation X]] voters, 45 percent of [[Democrat]]s, and 66 percent of voters who describe themselves as “[[moderate]].”<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/08/05/poll-swing-voters-hugely-oppose-2020-democrats-promising-more-immigration/</ref> Even among Hispanic voters and black Americans, increasing immigration was the second most unpopular position a 2020 presidential candidate could take — just after increasing taxes to pay for social programs. Likewise, voters are nearly unanimously opposed to giving illegal aliens the right to vote, as some left-wing communities have implemented. 85 percent said they oppose such a policy, including 80 percent of Democrat voters, 86 percent of swing voters, 75 percent of self-described “liberals,” 77 percent of black Americans, and 73 percent of Hispanic voters. Only 15 percent of Americans said they support giving illegal aliens the right to vote in U.S. elections.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/04/poll-increasing-immigration-giving-illegals-right-to-vote-most-unpopular-2020-political-positions/</ref> A Fall poll showed 72% of all voters opposed to allowing illegal aliens to obtain driver's licenses, including 74 percent of swing voters.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/17/poll-3-in-4-swing-voters-oppose-democrats-drivers-licenses-for-illegal-aliens/</ref> |
| − | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:98%; margin:left;"
| + | |
| − | |+Candidates for Democratic Presidential Nominee
| |
| − | |+Twitter followers
| |
| − | |+
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | ! colspan="3" style="border: 1px solid black; padding: 5px; background: #efefef;" |
| |
| − | ! colspan="9" style="border: 1px solid black; padding: 5px; background: #efefef;" | Twitter followers
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | !class=unsortable|Candidate
| |
| − | !<font size="-2">CA<br>ND<br>.<br>SO<br>RT
| |
| − | !class=unsortable|Home<br>state
| |
| − | !style="border-right:1px solid gray"|Accts<br>as of<br>June<br>29
| |
| − | !style="border-right:1px solid gray"|New<br>accts<br>July<br>30
| |
| − | !style="border-right:1px solid gray"|New<br>accts<br>Aug<br>26
| |
| − | !style="border-right:1px solid gray"|New<br>accts<br>Oct<br>1
| |
| − | !New<br>accts<br>Nov<br>1
| |
| − | !New<br>accts<br>Nov<br>18
| |
| − | !New<br>accts<br>Dec<br>16
| |
| − | !New<br>accts<br>Feb<br>3
| |
| − | !New<br>accts<br>Mar<br>5
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |align="left"|Sen. [[Bernie Sanders]]
| |
| − | |{{invi|San}}
| |
| − | |align="center"|VT
| |
| − | |align="right" style="border-right:1px solid gray"|17.8M:2
| |
| − | |align="right" style="border-right:1px solid gray"|+134,000
| |
| − | |align="right" style="border-right:1px solid gray"|+264,000
| |
| − | |align="right" style="border-right:1px solid gray"|+93,000
| |
| − | |align="right"|+286,000
| |
| − | |align="right"|+108,000
| |
| − | |align="right"|+155,000
| |
| − | |align="right"|+521,000
| |
| − | |align="right"|+845,000
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |align="left"|V. Pres [[Joe Biden]]
| |
| − | |{{invi|Bid}}
| |
| − | |align="center"|DE
| |
| − | |align="right" style="border-right:1px solid gray"| 03.6M:1
| |
| − | |align="right" style="border-right:1px solid gray"|+19,000
| |
| − | |align="right" style="border-right:1px solid gray"|+64,000
| |
| − | |align="right" style="border-right:1px solid gray"|+45,000
| |
| − | |align="right"|+145,000
| |
| − | |align="right"|+27,000
| |
| − | |align="right"|+63,000
| |
| − | |align="right"|+133,000
| |
| − | |align="right"|+152,000
| |
| − | |}
| |
| | ''[[Politico]]'' distorted poll results to favor Elizabeth Warren over Bernie Sanders.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibYh7_J6Vck&feature=youtu.be</ref> Dissatisfaction and disgust with the Democratic field of 25 candidates reached such a low by July 2019 that even Hillary Clinton's name was bandied about as an alternative.<ref>https://nypost.com/2018/07/07/is-hillary-clinton-secretly-planning-to-run-in-2020/</ref> After Bernie Sanders [[heart attack]], disgust with Elizabeth Warrens's anti-prosperity gospel, and Joe Biden's Ukrainian corruption collusion was exposed, 59% of Democrats still did not want to see Hillary enter the race.<ref>[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/trump_vs_clinton_is_still_neck_and_neck]</ref> When Beto O'Rourke dropped out in early November 2019 with 0.8% in Democrat polls, a CNN poll claimed he was beating Preisdent Trump by 10 points.<ref>https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/beto-orourke-drops-out-of-race-for-president-morning-joe-the-president-trails-beto-by-10-points-in-a-new-cnn-ssrs-2020-general-election-poll/</ref> | | ''[[Politico]]'' distorted poll results to favor Elizabeth Warren over Bernie Sanders.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibYh7_J6Vck&feature=youtu.be</ref> Dissatisfaction and disgust with the Democratic field of 25 candidates reached such a low by July 2019 that even Hillary Clinton's name was bandied about as an alternative.<ref>https://nypost.com/2018/07/07/is-hillary-clinton-secretly-planning-to-run-in-2020/</ref> After Bernie Sanders [[heart attack]], disgust with Elizabeth Warrens's anti-prosperity gospel, and Joe Biden's Ukrainian corruption collusion was exposed, 59% of Democrats still did not want to see Hillary enter the race.<ref>[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/trump_vs_clinton_is_still_neck_and_neck]</ref> When Beto O'Rourke dropped out in early November 2019 with 0.8% in Democrat polls, a CNN poll claimed he was beating Preisdent Trump by 10 points.<ref>https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/beto-orourke-drops-out-of-race-for-president-morning-joe-the-president-trails-beto-by-10-points-in-a-new-cnn-ssrs-2020-general-election-poll/</ref> |
| | | | |