Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
19 bytes removed ,  03:36, May 20, 2020
Spelling, grammar, and general cleanup, typos fixed: Council → council (2), President → president, she’s → she's, ’s → 's (7)
Line 52: Line 52:     
==CFR Membership==
 
==CFR Membership==
−
Tulsi Gabbard held a 5-year Term membership, with the Council on Foreign Relations<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/Council_on_Foreign_Relations</ref>, which expired on July 1, 2019.  In an interview with big Tulsi advocate, Niko House, in March 2019, Tulsi answers questions regarding her membership with the CFR, that went viral on social media earlier this year, without ever touching on the traditional role of the Council in selecting each elected President’s Cabinet<ref>https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25475-some-of-trump-s-picks-have-troubling-links-to-globalism-cfr</ref>, including heads of National Security, CIA Director, Department of Defense heads, Justice, and Treasury Secretary, key Ambassador positions, and some Supreme Court appointments, from its own members.<ref>https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3582/CFR-Members-And-Bilderberg-Attendees-Appointed-By-Donald-Trump-Taken-from-the-CFR-membership-and-Bilderberg-participant-lists.aspx</ref> Tulsi’s campaign message is based on the pretention that the U.S. President dictates to the CFR, America’s foreign policy, and that therefore Tulsi Gabbard will end Middle East and regime-change wars, based on Presidential/Constitutionally elected authority alone, without letting on that the opposite appears likely true – that the President is a figurehead, who executes the orders of the CFR and other shadow secret societies such as Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission.<ref>http://libertygalaxy.com/cfr-bilderberg-in-trump-admin/</ref>  Tulsi’s main support comes from uninformed and easily deceived Progressive Democrats, whose source of info on the CFR is generally limited to what they read on Wikipedia and in mainstream media sources including the Guardian and Intercept as their primary news sources.  Their sources describe the Council as a benign advisory think tank that compliments the elected President’s foreign policies.<ref> https://youtu.be/2jArVljkZy4</ref>
+
Tulsi Gabbard held a 5-year Term membership, with the Council on Foreign Relations,<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/Council_on_Foreign_Relations</ref> which expired on July 1, 2019.  In an interview with big Tulsi advocate, Niko House, in March 2019, Tulsi answers questions regarding her membership with the CFR, that went viral on social media earlier this year, without ever touching on the traditional role of the council in selecting each elected President's Cabinet,<ref>https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25475-some-of-trump-s-picks-have-troubling-links-to-globalism-cfr</ref> including heads of National Security, CIA Director, Department of Defense heads, Justice, and Treasury Secretary, key Ambassador positions, and some Supreme Court appointments, from its own members.<ref>https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3582/CFR-Members-And-Bilderberg-Attendees-Appointed-By-Donald-Trump-Taken-from-the-CFR-membership-and-Bilderberg-participant-lists.aspx</ref> Tulsi's campaign message is based on the pretention that the U.S. president dictates to the CFR, America's foreign policy, and that therefore Tulsi Gabbard will end Middle East and regime-change wars, based on Presidential/Constitutionally elected authority alone, without letting on that the opposite appears likely true – that the President is a figurehead, who executes the orders of the CFR and other shadow secret societies such as Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission.<ref>http://libertygalaxy.com/cfr-bilderberg-in-trump-admin/</ref>  Tulsi's main support comes from uninformed and easily deceived Progressive Democrats, whose source of info on the CFR is generally limited to what they read on Wikipedia and in mainstream media sources including the Guardian and Intercept as their primary news sources.  Their sources describe the council as a benign advisory think tank that compliments the elected President's foreign policies.<ref>https://youtu.be/2jArVljkZy4</ref>
    
==Foreign Policy==
 
==Foreign Policy==
−
Tulsi Gabbard’s anti-interventionist foreign policy initiatives appear aligned with the new Washington, DC based think tank – The Quincy Institute, funded with seed money from George Soros and Charles Koch.<ref>http://www.europereloaded.com/new-soros-koch-funded-think-tank-claims-to-oppose-us-forever-war-the-tulsi-effect/</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/08/27/why-are-george-soros-charles-koch-collaborating-us-bashing-think-tank/</ref><ref>https://www.thenation.com/article/quincy-institute-responsible-statecraft-think-tank/</ref>
+
Tulsi Gabbard's anti-interventionist foreign policy initiatives appear aligned with the new Washington, DC based think tank – The Quincy Institute, funded with seed money from George Soros and Charles Koch.<ref>http://www.europereloaded.com/new-soros-koch-funded-think-tank-claims-to-oppose-us-forever-war-the-tulsi-effect/</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/08/27/why-are-george-soros-charles-koch-collaborating-us-bashing-think-tank/</ref><ref>https://www.thenation.com/article/quincy-institute-responsible-statecraft-think-tank/</ref>
    
On 11 September 2019 she stated that "[[Al Qaeda]] Is Stronger Now Than They Were on [[9/11]]".<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/09/11/tulsi-gabbard-al-qaeda-is-stronger-now-than-they-were-on-9-11/</ref>  Tulsi Gabbard is one of the just NINE Democrats in the House to miss the vote on HR 1327 “Never Forget the Heroes” Permanent Authorization of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund Act.<ref>http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll474.xml</ref>
 
On 11 September 2019 she stated that "[[Al Qaeda]] Is Stronger Now Than They Were on [[9/11]]".<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/09/11/tulsi-gabbard-al-qaeda-is-stronger-now-than-they-were-on-9-11/</ref>  Tulsi Gabbard is one of the just NINE Democrats in the House to miss the vote on HR 1327 “Never Forget the Heroes” Permanent Authorization of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund Act.<ref>http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll474.xml</ref>
Line 64: Line 64:     
==Position on Abortion==
 
==Position on Abortion==
−
Although Tulsi Gabbard claims she is opposed to third-trimester [[abortion]], her actual Congressional abortion voting records tell a different story.<ref>https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/129306/tulsi-gabbard/2/abortion#.Xb4LlW5Fw2x</ref>  Tulsi Gabbard claims she “personally” does not support abortion, and now late-term abortion.  However, she goes on to say a woman has the right to choose, and no government may stop them.  Then as a U.S. House Representative of Congress, she’s passed many abortion laws, blocked laws designed to protect children, including pain-capable and born alive initiatives, has not overturned any of her existing laws in spite of her claimed lack of support for them, and year-after-year funded Planned Parenthood, providing facilities and doctors to mass murder babies. Tulsi Gabbard passed the laws promoting abortion, the legalized murder of unborn children, while promising to "protect all Americans from harm".  Many ISKCON/Hare Krishna leaders and members are currently promoting her to their congregation and to the public as a lifelong Vaishnava saint and avatar, despite their scriptures and teachings being decidedly pro-life and in opposition to Tulsi Gabbard's actions.<ref>https://back2godhead.com/category/society/abortion/</ref> After fooling the Hare Krishna religion and the Indian community that supports them, she's now moved on to the Catholic Church, whose congregation is being told Tulsi Gabbard supports a ban on late-term abortion as well.<ref>https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2019/09/10/tulsi-gabbard-supports-late-term-abortion-ban/</ref>  Careful tracking of Tulsi's campaign however, shows one set of messages delivered to conservative voters and different messages for her Democrat Party constituents, which is consistent with the Democrat Party platform on this issue.  In the first Democrat Party debate, Tulsi admitted that she's pro-abortion.
+
Although Tulsi Gabbard claims she is opposed to third-trimester [[abortion]], her actual Congressional abortion voting records tell a different story.<ref>https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/129306/tulsi-gabbard/2/abortion#.Xb4LlW5Fw2x</ref>  Tulsi Gabbard claims she “personally” does not support abortion, and now late-term abortion.  However, she goes on to say a woman has the right to choose, and no government may stop them.  Then as a U.S. House Representative of Congress, she's passed many abortion laws, blocked laws designed to protect children, including pain-capable and born alive initiatives, has not overturned any of her existing laws in spite of her claimed lack of support for them, and year-after-year funded Planned Parenthood, providing facilities and doctors to mass murder babies. Tulsi Gabbard passed the laws promoting abortion, the legalized murder of unborn children, while promising to "protect all Americans from harm".  Many ISKCON/Hare Krishna leaders and members are currently promoting her to their congregation and to the public as a lifelong Vaishnava saint and avatar, despite their scriptures and teachings being decidedly pro-life and in opposition to Tulsi Gabbard's actions.<ref>https://back2godhead.com/category/society/abortion/</ref> After fooling the Hare Krishna religion and the Indian community that supports them, she's now moved on to the Catholic Church, whose congregation is being told Tulsi Gabbard supports a ban on late-term abortion as well.<ref>https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2019/09/10/tulsi-gabbard-supports-late-term-abortion-ban/</ref>  Careful tracking of Tulsi's campaign however, shows one set of messages delivered to conservative voters and different messages for her Democrat Party constituents, which is consistent with the Democrat Party platform on this issue.  In the first Democrat Party debate, Tulsi admitted that she's pro-abortion.
    
==2020 presidential election==
 
==2020 presidential election==
Line 87: Line 87:     
===DNC attacks===
 
===DNC attacks===
−
As a result of Google and Clinton's electikon meddling, Gabbard has consistently polled below 2%.<ref>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html</ref> Gabbard campaign and her key conservative media supporters<ref>https://21stcenturywire.com/2019/08/26/gabbard-is-victim-of-dncs-rigged-debate-criteria/</ref>, including U.S. based Russian media, claim her poll results are illegitimate.  
+
As a result of Google and Clinton's electikon meddling, Gabbard has consistently polled below 2%.<ref>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html</ref> Gabbard campaign and her key conservative media supporters,<ref>https://21stcenturywire.com/2019/08/26/gabbard-is-victim-of-dncs-rigged-debate-criteria/</ref> including U.S. based Russian media, claim her poll results are illegitimate.  
   −
After Bernie Sanders suffered a heartattack and questions loomed over his health, Gabbard said "People who have supported [[Bernie Sanders]] in the past are coming to my campaign now."<ref>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_presidential_primary-6276.html</ref>.
+
After Bernie Sanders suffered a heartattack and questions loomed over his health, Gabbard said "People who have supported [[Bernie Sanders]] in the past are coming to my campaign now.".<ref>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_presidential_primary-6276.html</ref>
    
===Clinton election meddling===
 
===Clinton election meddling===
Line 112: Line 112:  
On [[MSNBC]]'s ''Morning Joe'', Gabbard had this exchange with reporter Kasi Hunt: {{Quotebox|'''Hunt:''' Do you think [[Bashar Assad|Assad]] is our enemy?<br>'''Gabbard:''' Assad is not the enemy of the [[United States]] because [[Syria]] does not pose a direct threat to the United States.<br>'''Hunt''': What do you say to Democratic voters who watched you go over there, and what do you say to military members who have been deployed repeatedly in Syria pushing back against Assad?<br>'''Gabbard''': People who have been deployed to Syria have been there focused on their mission, which has been to defeat [[ISIS]]. Our troops have not gone to Syria to wage yet another costly, destructive [[regime change]] war.<ref>https://consortiumnews.com/2019/02/12/tulsi-gabbard-is-driving-the-msm-crazy/</ref>}}
 
On [[MSNBC]]'s ''Morning Joe'', Gabbard had this exchange with reporter Kasi Hunt: {{Quotebox|'''Hunt:''' Do you think [[Bashar Assad|Assad]] is our enemy?<br>'''Gabbard:''' Assad is not the enemy of the [[United States]] because [[Syria]] does not pose a direct threat to the United States.<br>'''Hunt''': What do you say to Democratic voters who watched you go over there, and what do you say to military members who have been deployed repeatedly in Syria pushing back against Assad?<br>'''Gabbard''': People who have been deployed to Syria have been there focused on their mission, which has been to defeat [[ISIS]]. Our troops have not gone to Syria to wage yet another costly, destructive [[regime change]] war.<ref>https://consortiumnews.com/2019/02/12/tulsi-gabbard-is-driving-the-msm-crazy/</ref>}}
   −
Gabbard has highlighted her noninterventionist America First foreign policy. Gabbard said, "When it comes to the war against [[terrorist]]s, I'm a hawk. When it comes to counterproductive wars of [[regime change]], I'm a dove", <ref>https://www.cfr.org/blog/campaign-2020-tulsi-gabbard-democratic-presidential-candidate</ref> however Gabbard never defines who the terrorists are, reminiscent of the Bush/Obama era endless War on Terror.  
+
Gabbard has highlighted her noninterventionist America First foreign policy. Gabbard said, "When it comes to the war against [[terrorist]]s, I'm a hawk. When it comes to counterproductive wars of [[regime change]], I'm a dove",<ref>https://www.cfr.org/blog/campaign-2020-tulsi-gabbard-democratic-presidential-candidate</ref> however Gabbard never defines who the terrorists are, reminiscent of the Bush/Obama era endless War on Terror.  
    
Gabbard has said, “So long as this foreign policy establishment retains its power and the status quo is continued, we will never have the resources we need to serve those urgent needs of people here at home."  Gabbard defines these urgent needs to include tackling non-existent Climate Change and providing welfare to illegal aliens.  Gabbard also suggests saving the Great Barrier reef with money saved from war, rather than the novel idea of refunds to taxpayers.
 
Gabbard has said, “So long as this foreign policy establishment retains its power and the status quo is continued, we will never have the resources we need to serve those urgent needs of people here at home."  Gabbard defines these urgent needs to include tackling non-existent Climate Change and providing welfare to illegal aliens.  Gabbard also suggests saving the Great Barrier reef with money saved from war, rather than the novel idea of refunds to taxpayers.
Line 119: Line 119:     
==Military career==
 
==Military career==
−
Gabbard is a military police officer with the Hawaii Army National Guard holding the rank of Major, has served two tours of duty in [[Iraq]], and trained with the Indonesian army, spanning 16 years of military service. Gabbard claims she's a "combat vet" who has "dedicated most of her adult life to protecting the safety, security and freedom of ALL Americans "<ref>https://youtu.be/-Y8ayIpjPvY</ref>(beginning at 1:50), however never served in a combat role and didn't protect all Americans.<ref>https://www.isidewith.com/candidates/tulsi-gabbard/policies/social/abortion</ref>.
+
Gabbard is a military police officer with the Hawaii Army National Guard holding the rank of Major, has served two tours of duty in [[Iraq]], and trained with the Indonesian army, spanning 16 years of military service. Gabbard claims she's a "combat vet" who has "dedicated most of her adult life to protecting the safety, security and freedom of ALL Americans "<ref>https://youtu.be/-Y8ayIpjPvY</ref>(beginning at 1:50), however never served in a combat role and didn't protect all Americans.<ref>https://www.isidewith.com/candidates/tulsi-gabbard/policies/social/abortion</ref>
    
===Is Tulsi Gabbard's claim to be a "Combat Vet" an exaggeration?===
 
===Is Tulsi Gabbard's claim to be a "Combat Vet" an exaggeration?===
 
Tulsi never saw combat other than observing the horrors of war from a safe distance.  Therefore, her campaign appears to be exaggerating her war experience as a “combat vet”.  As a daughter of Hawaii State Senator, Mike Gabbard, Tulsi was never placed in harm's way during her two Iraq War tours.  She served as a field hospital administrator/desk job, pushing papers and trained military police.<ref>http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/213120-female-recipient-of-combat-medical-badge/</ref> Gabbard never led a force into battle, took or exchanged fire.  During the Obama admin. rules changed, so that military personal now receive MSM citation simply for being stationed in a war zone, that was formerly reserved for doctors and nurses serving in units under fire. According to some observers, Gabbard doesn't possess proper Medical MOS credentials other than as an administrator ineligible for receiving the citation and didn't serve in a unit eligible for her award. (Read the comments at the bottom of referred page)<ref>https://247sports.com/college/kansas/Board/103734/Contents/Tulsi-Gabbard-interview-121757314/?page=1</ref>  National Guard and Army Reserve personnel traditionally serve in non-combat support roles.
 
Tulsi never saw combat other than observing the horrors of war from a safe distance.  Therefore, her campaign appears to be exaggerating her war experience as a “combat vet”.  As a daughter of Hawaii State Senator, Mike Gabbard, Tulsi was never placed in harm's way during her two Iraq War tours.  She served as a field hospital administrator/desk job, pushing papers and trained military police.<ref>http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/213120-female-recipient-of-combat-medical-badge/</ref> Gabbard never led a force into battle, took or exchanged fire.  During the Obama admin. rules changed, so that military personal now receive MSM citation simply for being stationed in a war zone, that was formerly reserved for doctors and nurses serving in units under fire. According to some observers, Gabbard doesn't possess proper Medical MOS credentials other than as an administrator ineligible for receiving the citation and didn't serve in a unit eligible for her award. (Read the comments at the bottom of referred page)<ref>https://247sports.com/college/kansas/Board/103734/Contents/Tulsi-Gabbard-interview-121757314/?page=1</ref>  National Guard and Army Reserve personnel traditionally serve in non-combat support roles.
   −
Questions from fellow veterans regarding oddities in reasoning for Tulsi Gabbard’s military awards:
+
Questions from fellow veterans regarding oddities in reasoning for Tulsi Gabbard's military awards:
    
1) How did a Second Lieutenant in the Hawaii National Guard, earn the prestigious Meritorious Service Medal, after serving just 12 months?
 
1) How did a Second Lieutenant in the Hawaii National Guard, earn the prestigious Meritorious Service Medal, after serving just 12 months?
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,371

edits

Navigation menu