1,405 bytes added
, 00:26, May 26, 2020
<center>''See also [[Flawed coronavirus studies]]''.</center>
Numerous '''coronavirus studies''' demonstrate the prophylactic and early use of [[hydroxychloroquine]] against [[COVID-19]], which are being ignored or downplayed for political reasons.
Here is a sampling of the growing list of valid studies confirming the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19:
== Minnesota data mining study ==
The incidence rate and mortality from [[COVID-19]] was found to be lower in patients on chronic hydroxychloroquine therapy, in a large Minnesota healthcare system.
Between April 1, 2019 and March 31, 2020, the database contained 1,271,014 unique patient encounters, including a total of 2945 COVID-19 tests, of which 125 (4.24%) were positive.
Among the tests performed, 124 (4.35%) were positive for COVID-19 while not having taken hydroxychloroquine,
while 96 tests were performed in patients with existing hydroxychloroquine prescriptions and only one (1.04%) was positive.
Two COVID-19 patients not on hydroxychloroquine died, while no COVID-19 patients not on hydroxychloroquine died.
Hydroxychloroquine appears to be effective against COVID-19 both as a prophylaxis and as early treatment.<ref>https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40267-020-00741-x.pdf</ref>
==References==
<references/>
{{coronavirus}}
[[category:coronavirus]]
{{coronavirus}}
[[category:coronavirus]]