Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
875
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: +
→How did they get to Australia? I'll tell you
::There used to be a useful explanation here of how it came to be that koalas migrated from their original home after the flood, to Australia. As that's the sort of thing that Wikipedia bans, it would be great to have it here. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 03:12, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
::There used to be a useful explanation here of how it came to be that koalas migrated from their original home after the flood, to Australia. As that's the sort of thing that Wikipedia bans, it would be great to have it here. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 03:12, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
:::If you are talking about [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Koala&diff=144577&oldid=144559 this deletion], that is a mixture of creationist views and fiction. It would need rewriting before it was put back in. IF that's not what you mean, please show me what bit you do mean. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:22, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
:::If you are talking about [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Koala&diff=144577&oldid=144559 this deletion], that is a mixture of creationist views and fiction. It would need rewriting before it was put back in. IF that's not what you mean, please show me what bit you do mean. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:22, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
::::That's the bit. Obviously it's just a theory - it could never be proven one way or the other. But the bits which are "official" creationist views should go back in if possible. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 02:56, 17 May 2007 (EDT)