nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: +
→How did they get to Australia? I'll tell you: Not for now
:::If you are talking about [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Koala&diff=144577&oldid=144559 this deletion], that is a mixture of creationist views and fiction. It would need rewriting before it was put back in. IF that's not what you mean, please show me what bit you do mean. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:22, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
:::If you are talking about [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Koala&diff=144577&oldid=144559 this deletion], that is a mixture of creationist views and fiction. It would need rewriting before it was put back in. IF that's not what you mean, please show me what bit you do mean. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:22, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
::::That's the bit. Obviously it's just a theory - it could never be proven one way or the other. But the bits which are "official" creationist views should go back in if possible. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 02:56, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
::::That's the bit. Obviously it's just a theory - it could never be proven one way or the other. But the bits which are "official" creationist views should go back in if possible. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 02:56, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::As long as there are no evolutionist views in the article, it might be better to leave that out for now. That's not to say that it can't go back at some time in the future. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:35, 17 May 2007 (EDT)