5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,164:
Line 1,164: + + + +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 12:40, August 25, 2020
, 12:40, August 25, 2020→request to change article on homosexuality: new section
:::I have no idea what's happening either. Also, I had just mentioned about the issue [[Talk:Main_Page#Server_errors|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]<sup>'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot!]]'''''</sup> Wednesday, 11:04, 19 August 2020 (EDT)
:::I have no idea what's happening either. Also, I had just mentioned about the issue [[Talk:Main_Page#Server_errors|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]<sup>'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot!]]'''''</sup> Wednesday, 11:04, 19 August 2020 (EDT)
::::Continuing to figure things out now. We have and will restore some of the edits. Sorry for the unexpected disruption!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 14:42, 19 August 2020 (EDT)
::::Continuing to figure things out now. We have and will restore some of the edits. Sorry for the unexpected disruption!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 14:42, 19 August 2020 (EDT)
== request to change article on homosexuality ==
Hey, nice work guys, I really love the articles. One thing I have noticed though is the lack of articles like "arguments FOR homosexuality." Now, I'm just as god-fearing as the rest of you, and I refuse to buy into the Homosexual Agenda as well, but if we want this place to maintain its non-partisanship, we should address both sides and deal with the Left's arguments accordingly. I was thinking about changing the existing debate articles by also including arguments for both sides. I have seen these leftists bring up some terrible points lately and I have just wanted to address them with this wonderful community