105
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 294:
Line 294: + +
→Why the reversion on the "Jesus Christ" article?
::: Personally, I believe that the Bible is the infallible word of God. The Bible says that Jesus is the Son of God. Therefore, it is a FACT that Jesus is the son of God. I have no doubt in my mind that He is, I don't have to wait until I die to know for sure. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 17:45, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
::: Personally, I believe that the Bible is the infallible word of God. The Bible says that Jesus is the Son of God. Therefore, it is a FACT that Jesus is the son of God. I have no doubt in my mind that He is, I don't have to wait until I die to know for sure. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 17:45, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
:::: The fact that you believe something to be infallible does not make it so. You cannot accurately say that Jesus is the Son of God; from what you said, you can accurately say that you BELIEVE that Jesus is the Son of God, because you believe that the Bible is God's infallible word. I can say that I believe that "The Once and Future King" is literally true, but that wouldn't justify my claiming that Arthur IS the true king of England.--[[User:M|M]] 10:26, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
== Deletedpage ==
== Deletedpage ==