Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 93: Line 93:  
{{quotebox|Critical race theory contends that America is permanently racist to its core, and that consequently the nation’s legal structures are, by definition, racist and invalid … members of “oppressed” racial groups are entitled—in fact obligated—to determine for themselves which laws and traditions have merit and are worth observing. …}}
 
{{quotebox|Critical race theory contends that America is permanently racist to its core, and that consequently the nation’s legal structures are, by definition, racist and invalid … members of “oppressed” racial groups are entitled—in fact obligated—to determine for themselves which laws and traditions have merit and are worth observing. …}}
 
Bell’s theory is in turn an innovation of [[Critical Theory]], which was developed by Marxist thinkers of the [[Frankfurt School]] in Frankfurt, Germany, in 1923. The Institute’s left-wing scholars fled Hitler’s Germany in the 1930s, relocating to [[Columbia University]] in New York. Critical Theory, which discredits all aspects of Western society, we know today as [[political correctness]]. One of its most famous purveyors was the Frankfurt School’s [[Herbert Marcuse]], longtime associate of the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]]’s [[Julian Bond]]. Marcuse invented the concept of “partisan tolerance,” that is, [[tolerance]] for leftist ideas and [[intolerance]] of all others. The Southern Poverty Law Center applied Marcuse’s strategy in developing its “Hate Watch” list, and ''[[Rules for Radicals]]'' author [[Saul Alinsky]] used it in his own life’s work.
 
Bell’s theory is in turn an innovation of [[Critical Theory]], which was developed by Marxist thinkers of the [[Frankfurt School]] in Frankfurt, Germany, in 1923. The Institute’s left-wing scholars fled Hitler’s Germany in the 1930s, relocating to [[Columbia University]] in New York. Critical Theory, which discredits all aspects of Western society, we know today as [[political correctness]]. One of its most famous purveyors was the Frankfurt School’s [[Herbert Marcuse]], longtime associate of the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]]’s [[Julian Bond]]. Marcuse invented the concept of “partisan tolerance,” that is, [[tolerance]] for leftist ideas and [[intolerance]] of all others. The Southern Poverty Law Center applied Marcuse’s strategy in developing its “Hate Watch” list, and ''[[Rules for Radicals]]'' author [[Saul Alinsky]] used it in his own life’s work.
 +
 +
===Under Obama, there came to be a cancer in the Pentagon===
 +
:{{See also|Biden Puech}}
 +
Michael Anton cited to the Democrats’ own words:
 +
{{quotebox|Over the summer a story was deliberately leaked to the press of a meeting at which 100 Democratic grandees, [[NeverTrump|anti-Trump]] former Republicans, and other ruling class [[apparatchik]]s got together (on [[George Soros]]’s dime) to “game out” various outcomes of the 2020 election. One such outcome was a clear Trump win. In that eventuality, former Bill Clinton White House [[Chief of Staff]] [[John Podesta]], playing Biden, refused to concede, pressured states that Trump won to send Democrats to the formal [[Electoral College]] vote, and trusted that the [[military]] would take care of the rest.
 +
 +
The leaked report from the exercise darkly concluded that “[[technocrat]]ic solutions, [[court]]s, and reliance on elites observing norms are not the answer here,” promising that what would follow the November election would be “a street fight, not a legal battle.”<ref>https://americanmind.org/essays/the-coming-coup/</ref>}}
 +
One of the scenarios was a “clear Trump win.” That is, the Democrats are not talking about making an uproar if there’s a repeat of the 2000 election when one state (Florida) had a narrow victory for [[George W. Bush|Bush]]. Instead, the Democrats are saying that if Trump has a repeat of [[Nixon]]’s 49-state sweep, they’re going to take to the street.  The Bookworm Room blog observed,
 +
{{quotebox|Obama seeded the [[Pentagon]] with [[Deep State]]rs who have more reverence for permanent power than they do for the [[Constitution]]. After all, Trump, by making peace in the [[Middle East]] and in the [[Balkans]], and by refusing to engage in wars that don’t directly benefit America, is a threat to these officers — and that’s despite the fact the Trump has built up the military like crazy. Once the military’s built up, the retired officers no longer have well-paid sinecures in the [[military-industrial complex]] and the active-duty officers have fewer opportunities for promotion. For them, Trump’s a career killer. [...]
 +
 +
The other sign that the Democrats are preparing a [[coup]] involving military cooperation is the Jeffrey Goldberg ''[[The Atlantic|Atlantic]]'' article that accuses Trump if disrespecting the military. The obvious purpose behind the article is to suppress the pro-Trump military vote. The secondary, and more important purpose, is to tell the troops that, once the coup starts, they shouldn’t support Trump because he does not support them.  That’s it. That’s the whole reason for anonymous statements that bear no resemblance to Trump’s excessive concern for the military, whether it’s funding it, blowing up Soleimani, withdrawing troops from war zones, or generally treating the military with open love and respect. [...]
 +
 +
Biden, after all, was at Obama’s right hand when the [[Obama administration]] gutted the military, threw the troops into pointless military operations, never bothered to take out terrorists like [[Qassem Soleimani]], and abandoned former military people in [[Benghazi massacre|Benghazi]]. [...]
 +
 +
Then again, remember what else Obama and Biden did during their eight years: They turned the military into a [[social justice]] experiment, that went far beyond ending [[Don't Ask, Don't Tell]] and, instead, allowing gay troops to serve openly. [...]
 +
 +
Another example of the effect Obama and Biden had on the military was the cross-dressing exercises at Arizona State’s Army ROTC during the Obama-Biden years:
 +
 +
:''Blisters, sweat and perhaps a little bit of blood was the sight at the Sun Devil Fitness Complex on Monday, when the men and women of ASU Army ROTC braved the Arizona heat to run in fabulous (and some not-so-fabulous) heels to raise awareness of sexual assault.
 +
 +
:''On Monday afternoon, ASU Army ROTC program hosted the event, “Walk a Mile in Her Shoes,” which consisted of students in the ROTC program wearing heels and running 1.26 miles as part of Sexual Assault Awareness Month.
 +
 +
:[snip]
 +
 +
:''When ASU Army ROTC decided to hold an event for Sexual Assault Awareness Month, it realized walking a mile in high heels would bring school-wide attention to such an important issue, ROTC Cdt./Corporal Alexis Johnson said.
 +
 +
:''“The purpose of the event is to create a basis of understanding about sexual violence, stigmas and rape culture in the military as well as in our community and to reinforce standards of behavior, active bystander mentality and to be peer advisers to one’s unit and community,” Johnson said. “By walking in heels, the hope is to instill standards of behavior that will resonate.”
 +
 +
[...] the military, just like other parts of the permanent Deep State, told its troops that [[MAGA]] stands for [[white supremacy]]. The rot runs very deep. Who cares about destroying unit cohesion by pitting against each other the different races within a remarkably well-segregated military? It’s more important to defeat Trump.
 +
 +
[...] There are undoubtedly more leftists in the military than there were before. Also, given that the military’s claiming that supporting Trump is a sign of white supremacy, those troops who do support Trump probably wisely keep their mouths shut.
 +
 +
The point of this whole post is to get you very worried about what has happened to the American military since 2008. Obama and Biden had eight years to change it into an organization that, at the top, wants to continue to fight wars to keep their careers going — something Trump’s extraordinary [[diplomatic]] skills are ruining — and, at the bottom, has young people who have been marinated in [[identity politics]], [[LGBTQ]] theory, and [[critical race theory]].  Trump may have had minimal sway over the upper ranks because his policies are killing their jobs and he may have minimal sway over the lower ranks because the ideological corruption runs too deep."<ref>https://www.bookwormroom.com/2020/09/07/the-democrats-plan-for-the-military-in-the-coming-coup/</ref>}}
    
===Biden, spying, China, and globalism===
 
===Biden, spying, China, and globalism===
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,243

edits

Navigation menu