Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,100
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,477:
Line 1,477: − +
→Burning at the stake, Biblical pretext for
This article still retains a See also link to [[Burning at the stake, Biblical pretext for]]. That mainspace article has been moved to [[Burning at the stake]], although a Redirect still exists. The mainspace Burning at the stake itself is a controversial article, and thus far the consensus appears to Keep it. However the link here appears to further an argument that a Biblical pretext for burning at the stake exists for those who reject the doctrine of Infant baptism.
This article still retains a See also link to [[Burning at the stake, Biblical pretext for]]. That mainspace article has been moved to [[Burning at the stake]], although a Redirect still exists. The mainspace Burning at the stake itself is a controversial article, and thus far the consensus appears to Keep it. However the link here appears to further an argument that a Biblical pretext for burning at the stake exists for those who reject the doctrine of Infant baptism.
I am inclined to both leave the Redirect as is in the See alsos, and not delete the Redirect yet until this article itself is cleaned up. What do others think? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 12:25, 20 October 2020 (EDT)
I am inclined to both leave the Redirect 'as is' in the See alsos, and not delete the Redirect yet until this article itself is cleaned up. What do others think? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 12:25, 20 October 2020 (EDT)