Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
wikify
Line 14: Line 14:  
!Notes
 
!Notes
 
|-
 
|-
−
|North Carolina
+
|[[North Carolina]]
 
|Cunningham (D)
 
|Cunningham (D)
 
|<nowiki>+</nowiki>2.3
 
|<nowiki>+</nowiki>2.3
 
|Aggregate skewed slightly to the left due to an untrustworthy poll by the biased Change Research.<ref>[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/senate/nc/north_carolina_senate_tillis_vs_cunningham-6908.html North Carolina Senate - Tillis vs. Cunningham]</ref>
 
|Aggregate skewed slightly to the left due to an untrustworthy poll by the biased Change Research.<ref>[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/senate/nc/north_carolina_senate_tillis_vs_cunningham-6908.html North Carolina Senate - Tillis vs. Cunningham]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
−
|Michigan
+
|[[Michigan]]
−
|Peters (D)
+
|Peters ([[Democrat|D]])
 
|<nowiki>+</nowiki>4.7
 
|<nowiki>+</nowiki>4.7
 
|Aggregate likely skewed to the left due to suspicious Ipsos/[[Reuters]] poll in addition to one by Change Research.<ref>[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/senate/mi/michigan_senate_james_vs_peters-6964.html Michigan Senate - James vs. Peters]</ref>
 
|Aggregate likely skewed to the left due to suspicious Ipsos/[[Reuters]] poll in addition to one by Change Research.<ref>[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/senate/mi/michigan_senate_james_vs_peters-6964.html Michigan Senate - James vs. Peters]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
−
|Iowa
+
|[[Iowa]]
−
|Greenfield (D)
+
|Greenfield ([[Democrat|D]])
 
|<nowiki>+</nowiki>4.6
 
|<nowiki>+</nowiki>4.6
 
|Aggregate skewed to the left, largely due poll from highly untrustworthy source Quinnipiac;<ref>[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/senate/ia/iowa_senate_ernst_vs_greenfield-7072.html Iowa Senate - Ernst vs. Greenfield]</ref> [[Iowa]] polling tends to overestimate Democrats, as occurred in the [[2018 Midterms]] with the state's gubernatorial election.
 
|Aggregate skewed to the left, largely due poll from highly untrustworthy source Quinnipiac;<ref>[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/senate/ia/iowa_senate_ernst_vs_greenfield-7072.html Iowa Senate - Ernst vs. Greenfield]</ref> [[Iowa]] polling tends to overestimate Democrats, as occurred in the [[2018 Midterms]] with the state's gubernatorial election.
 
|-
 
|-
−
|Arizona
+
|[[Arizona]]
−
|Kelly (D)
+
|Kelly ([[Democrat|D]])
 
|<nowiki>+</nowiki>8.4
 
|<nowiki>+</nowiki>8.4
 
|Aggregate strongly skewed to the left due to unreliable/fake polling,<ref>[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/senate/az/arizona_senate_mcsally_vs_kelly-6801.html Arizona Senate - McSally vs. Kelly]</ref> including one by [[CBS]]/YouGov analyzed [[Essay:Analyses_of_misleading_polls#October_21.2C_2020|here]].
 
|Aggregate strongly skewed to the left due to unreliable/fake polling,<ref>[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/senate/az/arizona_senate_mcsally_vs_kelly-6801.html Arizona Senate - McSally vs. Kelly]</ref> including one by [[CBS]]/YouGov analyzed [[Essay:Analyses_of_misleading_polls#October_21.2C_2020|here]].
 
|-
 
|-
−
|Georgia
+
|[[Georgia]]
−
|Warnock (D)
+
|Warnock ([[Democrat|D]])
 
|<nowiki>+</nowiki>10.6
 
|<nowiki>+</nowiki>10.6
 
|Warnock lead largely due to backing by Democrat establishment and evaporating support for Lieberman; note election to be a jungle primary ([[United_States_Senate_elections,_2020#Georgia_.28special.29|see below]]).
 
|Warnock lead largely due to backing by Democrat establishment and evaporating support for Lieberman; note election to be a jungle primary ([[United_States_Senate_elections,_2020#Georgia_.28special.29|see below]]).
SkipCaptcha
35,519

edits

Navigation menu