| Line 135: |
Line 135: |
| | So, you can see where the lower court judges are finding their “justification” for rewriting election rules more to the liking of plaintiffs who — in every case I’ve looked at — are Democrat party interest groups."<ref>https://www.redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/10/04/a-supreme-court-showdown-of-federal-judges-rewriting-state-election-laws-based-on-covid-is-at-hand/</ref>}} | | So, you can see where the lower court judges are finding their “justification” for rewriting election rules more to the liking of plaintiffs who — in every case I’ve looked at — are Democrat party interest groups."<ref>https://www.redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/10/04/a-supreme-court-showdown-of-federal-judges-rewriting-state-election-laws-based-on-covid-is-at-hand/</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| − | ===2020 voter fraud=== | + | ====2020 voter fraud==== |
| − | ====Ballot dump==== | + | =====Ballot dump===== |
| | [[File:Milwaukee turnout 2020.jpeg|left|300px|thumb|Turnout exceeded registered voters in some Milwaukee precincts by 200%.]] | | [[File:Milwaukee turnout 2020.jpeg|left|300px|thumb|Turnout exceeded registered voters in some Milwaukee precincts by 200%.]] |
| | Theredelephants reports in [[Wisconsin]], voter turnout matched the record high of 2004. The Wisconsin Elections Commission uses the estimated voting age population as the denominator when calculating statewide voter turnout numbers. According to the Elections Commission, there was a 73 percent turnout in this Wisconsin election. | | Theredelephants reports in [[Wisconsin]], voter turnout matched the record high of 2004. The Wisconsin Elections Commission uses the estimated voting age population as the denominator when calculating statewide voter turnout numbers. According to the Elections Commission, there was a 73 percent turnout in this Wisconsin election. |
| Line 152: |
Line 152: |
| | The increase in Democrats relative to Republicans was significantly higher when the Democrat was doing worse overall in early counting. Within each ward, late votes broke heavily to the Democrat in exactly the races where they are likely to affect the result. | | The increase in Democrats relative to Republicans was significantly higher when the Democrat was doing worse overall in early counting. Within each ward, late votes broke heavily to the Democrat in exactly the races where they are likely to affect the result. |
| | | | |
| − | ====Illegal instructions from the Election Board==== | + | =====Illegal instructions from the Election Board===== |
| | [[File:Wisconsin-Rock-County-3.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Vote switching in Rock County, Wisconsin.]] | | [[File:Wisconsin-Rock-County-3.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Vote switching in Rock County, Wisconsin.]] |
| | In Wisconsin, the law states that ballots returned by a third party absent a witness statement are invalid and not to be counted. Municipal clerks and vote counters across the state filled out witness signatures themselves. Acting on false and unlawful advice from the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), these clerks may have invalidated thousands of [[absentee ballot|absentee votes]]. | | In Wisconsin, the law states that ballots returned by a third party absent a witness statement are invalid and not to be counted. Municipal clerks and vote counters across the state filled out witness signatures themselves. Acting on false and unlawful advice from the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), these clerks may have invalidated thousands of [[absentee ballot|absentee votes]]. |
| Line 164: |
Line 164: |
| | The Republican Party of Wisconsin estimates that thousands of witness addresses may have been changed, thus invalidating the ballots on which they appeared. The statutory remedy for this is to subtract a commensurate number of votes for the candidates for whom those ballots were cast, meaning that vote totals may substantially change. | | The Republican Party of Wisconsin estimates that thousands of witness addresses may have been changed, thus invalidating the ballots on which they appeared. The statutory remedy for this is to subtract a commensurate number of votes for the candidates for whom those ballots were cast, meaning that vote totals may substantially change. |
| | | | |
| − | ====Vote switching==== | + | =====Vote switching===== |
| | [[File:WI indefinite.png|right|350px|thumb|]] | | [[File:WI indefinite.png|right|350px|thumb|]] |
| | Evidence shows that the vote totals for Rock County appeared to be switched between President Trump and Joe Biden. 9,516 votes were eliminated from President Trump and moved to Joe Biden. This 19,032 vote difference when corrected would eliminate Biden’s lead in Wisconsin.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-exclusive-system-glitch-also-uncovered-wisconsin-reversal-19032-votes-removes-lead-joe-biden/aypundit.com</ref><ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/happening-mit-scientist-offer-president-trump-proof-computer-algorithm-likely-transferred-69000-votes-trump-joe-biden-michigan/</ref> | | Evidence shows that the vote totals for Rock County appeared to be switched between President Trump and Joe Biden. 9,516 votes were eliminated from President Trump and moved to Joe Biden. This 19,032 vote difference when corrected would eliminate Biden’s lead in Wisconsin.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-exclusive-system-glitch-also-uncovered-wisconsin-reversal-19032-votes-removes-lead-joe-biden/aypundit.com</ref><ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/happening-mit-scientist-offer-president-trump-proof-computer-algorithm-likely-transferred-69000-votes-trump-joe-biden-michigan/</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | ====Fraudulent ballots==== | + | =====Fraudulent ballots===== |
| | Under Wisconsin state law, a voter must present a valid photo ID when requesting to vote by mail. The exception to the rule is for those voters who are currently hospitalized or “indefinitely confined because of age, physical illness, or infirmity.”<ref>https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/11/24/trump-campaign-focusing-on-unlawful-use-of-absentee-ballot-process-to-avoid-wisconsin-id-requirement-n284528</ref> [[Covid]] doesn't meet the qualifications for an "indefinitely confined" voter. | | Under Wisconsin state law, a voter must present a valid photo ID when requesting to vote by mail. The exception to the rule is for those voters who are currently hospitalized or “indefinitely confined because of age, physical illness, or infirmity.”<ref>https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/11/24/trump-campaign-focusing-on-unlawful-use-of-absentee-ballot-process-to-avoid-wisconsin-id-requirement-n284528</ref> [[Covid]] doesn't meet the qualifications for an "indefinitely confined" voter. |
| | | | |