Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,905
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 324:
Line 324: + + + + + + + + +
Democrat election fraud (view source)
Revision as of 10:45, December 1, 2020
, 10:45, December 1, 2020→Arizona
When tabulators detect such an “overvote,” poll workers should give voters a choice to fix the problem, but the workers instead either pressed or told voters to press a button on the machine to override the error, leaving the devices to disregard the problematic ballot selections, according to the lawsuit.<ref>https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/11/07/2020-latest-trump-gop-sue-in-arizona-over-ballot-handling/</ref>
When tabulators detect such an “overvote,” poll workers should give voters a choice to fix the problem, but the workers instead either pressed or told voters to press a button on the machine to override the error, leaving the devices to disregard the problematic ballot selections, according to the lawsuit.<ref>https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/11/07/2020-latest-trump-gop-sue-in-arizona-over-ballot-handling/</ref>
A Pima county whistleblower stated that Democratic Party members invited him to a meeting on September 10, 2020 and outlined a plan to add 35,000e votes to each Democrat candidate.
{{quotebox-float|"When I asked how in the world will 35,000 votes be kept hidden from being discovered, it was stated that spread distribution will be embedded across the entire registered-voter range and will not exceed the registered-vote count, and the 35,000 was determined allowable in Pima County, based on our county registered-vote count.
It was also stated that total voter turnout versus total registered voters determine how many votes we can embed.
Maricopa [County] embed totals would be substantially higher than Pima’s due to embeds being based upon the total number of registered voters.
When I asked if this has been tested and how do we know it works, the answer was yes, and has shown success in Arizona judicial-retention elections since 2014, even undetectable in post-audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes in the full potential of total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters."<ref>https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/30/4-takeaways-from-arizonas-election-fraud-hearing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=4-takeaways-from-arizonas-election-fraud-hearing</ref>}}
===Racism and voter suppression===
===Racism and voter suppression===