Changes

Regarding the addition of that news item in the Main Page right column, it should have been worded as "Liberal Ninth Circuit ''illegally'' suspends Bill of Rights", as the actions of the liberal judges in that decision are purely politically motivated (while also attempting to read things into the Constitution that are not there and have never been) and, as with any other liberal activist judge, they're attempting to use powers they do not have (i.e. legislating from the bench) and have no right to use in the first place.  Given the history of bad decisions by the 9th Circuit (and its corresponding reputation of being the most-overturned circuit in the judicial branch), their illegal decision will not stand and you can bet that President Trump will weigh in on this (with especially strong rebukes for Nguyen and Silverman, the black-robed shysters who wrote the majority opinion).  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 02:25, 28 May 2020 (EDT)

Regarding the addition of that news item in the Main Page right column, it should have been worded as "Liberal Ninth Circuit ''illegally'' suspends Bill of Rights", as the actions of the liberal judges in that decision are purely politically motivated (while also attempting to read things into the Constitution that are not there and have never been) and, as with any other liberal activist judge, they're attempting to use powers they do not have (i.e. legislating from the bench) and have no right to use in the first place.  Given the history of bad decisions by the 9th Circuit (and its corresponding reputation of being the most-overturned circuit in the judicial branch), their illegal decision will not stand and you can bet that President Trump will weigh in on this (with especially strong rebukes for Nguyen and Silverman, the black-robed shysters who wrote the majority opinion).  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 02:25, 28 May 2020 (EDT)