19
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,183:
Line 1,183: + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
I recently tried contacting them via email--it hasn't been long enough to expect a reply yet. Hopefully they are aware and working on the issue, but it has been offline for a while now. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 15:10, 1 January 2021 (EST)
I recently tried contacting them via email--it hasn't been long enough to expect a reply yet. Hopefully they are aware and working on the issue, but it has been offline for a while now. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 15:10, 1 January 2021 (EST)
Hi,
I don't really know how to put this diplomatically, but here's my best shot...
I have been looking through Conservapedia's content and I have noticed that the vast majority of it is defending and promoting the ideology of conservatism, however, it seems to lack a lot of non-politics/conservative related content on things like aircraft, history (non-US history), geography etc. I would be happy to write these types of articles for Conservapedia, however, I am worried about them not falling into the remit of Conservapedia, could you please confirm this? Don't worry, I won't be offended if you say no...
Thanks in advance!