SkipCaptcha
35,519
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 729:
Line 729: + + +
Democrat election fraud (view source)
Revision as of 17:11, February 16, 2021
, 17:11, February 16, 2021no edit summary
“But, Manuel, your father has been dead ten years.”
“But, Manuel, your father has been dead ten years.”
“That’s true,” Manuel sobbed. “But he was here last Saturday and he voted for Lyndon Johnson, but he did not even come to see me.”<ref>https://archive.org/details/LaskyVictorItDidntStartWithWatergate/page/n133/mode/2up?q=county</ref>}}
“That’s true,” Manuel sobbed. “But he was here last Saturday and he voted for Lyndon Johnson, but he did not even come to see me.”<ref>https://archive.org/details/LaskyVictorItDidntStartWithWatergate/page/n133/mode/2up?q=county</ref>}}
==1930==
In the 1930 Senate election in [[North Carolina]], [[Josiah Bailey]] defeated an incumbent Democrat and, in the general election facing Republican George Pritchard, purportedly won by over 100,000 votes.<ref>[https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/contested_elections/115Pirchard_Bailey.htm The Election Case of George M. Pritchard v. Josiah W. Bailey of North Carolina (1933)]. ''senate.gov''. Retrieved February 16, 2021.</ref> Pritchard filed a petition to oppose the "official" results, charging that election fraud had given Bailey an unfair advantage.
==See also==
==See also==