Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
176 bytes added ,  20:29, February 24, 2021
m
Line 20: Line 20:  
Since the Seminar rejected the infallibility of the Gospels, it identified certain "criteria for authenticity", which included:
 
Since the Seminar rejected the infallibility of the Gospels, it identified certain "criteria for authenticity", which included:
 
*Multiple attestations (an account listed in more than one Gospel would be rated higher than one found in only one)
 
*Multiple attestations (an account listed in more than one Gospel would be rated higher than one found in only one)
−
*Embarrassment
+
*Embarrassment (an account that was embarrassing to the author or the people mentioned was likely more authentic, as an author would not invent a story to embarrass himself or his followers)
 
*Orality (the shorter the phrase, the more likely it was authentic)
 
*Orality (the shorter the phrase, the more likely it was authentic)
 
*Irony (if it was counter to the norm, the more likely it was authentic)
 
*Irony (if it was counter to the norm, the more likely it was authentic)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
8,856

edits

Navigation menu