Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 883:
Line 883: + +
→Look at this trolling edit
:::::''[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/communists-march-austin-texas-praise-mass-murderers-block-intersections-may-day-demonstration-video/ Communists March Through Austin, Texas – Praise Mass Murderers, Block Intersections in May Day Demonstration]''. Then add the relevancy of the citation somewhere in [[Communism#Communism_in_the_United_States]] section. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 01:17, 2 May 2021 (EDT)
:::::''[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/communists-march-austin-texas-praise-mass-murderers-block-intersections-may-day-demonstration-video/ Communists March Through Austin, Texas – Praise Mass Murderers, Block Intersections in May Day Demonstration]''. Then add the relevancy of the citation somewhere in [[Communism#Communism_in_the_United_States]] section. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 01:17, 2 May 2021 (EDT)
::::::Just as an FYI, I don't agree with the rule on not reverting an admin's edit. What's to say an admin doesn't, say, decide to vandalize the page, blank out the Communism article and replaces it with "I love communism", for example. Should we let it stay just because it was done by an admin? Or are we obligated to restore old edits if vandalized, even if the one who did it was an admin? [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 19:34, 2 May 2021 (EDT)