Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,568
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 885:
Line 885: + +
→Look at this trolling edit
::::::Just as an FYI, I don't agree with the rule on not reverting an admin's edit. What's to say an admin doesn't, say, decide to vandalize the page, blank out the Communism article and replaces it with "I love communism", for example. Should we let it stay just because it was done by an admin? Or are we obligated to restore old edits if vandalized, even if the one who did it was an admin? [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 19:34, 2 May 2021 (EDT)
::::::Just as an FYI, I don't agree with the rule on not reverting an admin's edit. What's to say an admin doesn't, say, decide to vandalize the page, blank out the Communism article and replaces it with "I love communism", for example. Should we let it stay just because it was done by an admin? Or are we obligated to restore old edits if vandalized, even if the one who did it was an admin? [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 19:34, 2 May 2021 (EDT)
:::::::Here is the [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=sysop list of CP Admin.] If anyone of these users the Revert button, i.e., not "Undo", you are free to ask on the talk page of that same article why. Simple rule: Do Not Undo a Revert. Secondly, Undoing an 'Undo' without discussion on talk page is initiating an edit war. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup>