Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + +
no edit summary
::::Brad Raffensperger cannot be used without naming him by name to make him look credible. Failing to do so appears to be the work of woke leftists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:56, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
::::Brad Raffensperger cannot be used without naming him by name to make him look credible. Failing to do so appears to be the work of woke leftists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:56, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
:::::HuffPost is a very left-wing source, yet when [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/this-endless-myth-making_b_151217 even THEY admit that Che Guevara was a scumbag who shouldn't be worshipped, broke ranks with their fellow leftists at that], it's still grounds for citation despite that. I'm pretty sure even Raffensberger still qualifies as a valid source in this particular case as well. Either way, I fail to see how Stacey Abrams comes out clean with that source, and if anything removing it is more likely to aid her than it is to aid Conservativism. To put it another way, I fail to see how Woke Leftists would have anything to gain citing Raffensberger at all, especially when if anything that would cause them to stop supporting Abrams. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 05:59, 11 May 2021 (EDT)