Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,244
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 488:
Line 488: +
→Thanks Rob
::IOWs, when Google scans the site, they are looking at a 72 hour old version, I think. The site owner knows those details and hasn't shared them. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 12:57, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
::IOWs, when Google scans the site, they are looking at a 72 hour old version, I think. The site owner knows those details and hasn't shared them. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 12:57, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
:::Interesting. But in case you haven't noticed it. Try viewing a page you or others just edited. Then sign off and view at it again. Spot the difference.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
:::Interesting. But in case you haven't noticed it. Try viewing a page you or others just edited. Then sign off and view at it again. Spot the difference.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])
::::As I noted earlier, Conservapedia famously has been the target of trolling attacks, so new users have to go through a probationary period to establish ''bona fides''. Apparently the site owner is reviewing your edits, at which point you'll be granted more users rights, etc. (like SkipCaptcha is the bottom rung of the ladder). The problem is, he also has a fulltime job and his time can be limited. Just keep doing what your doing and there shouldn't be a problem (we've discussed the anti-neocon bias editorial stance already). My guess is that any alleged 'controversial' edits should be cleared in 72 hours. I'll bring this up in discussion with another Admin slated for this weekend. Let me know if something added does not appear in 72 hours. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 13:21, 21 May 2021 (EDT)