Changes

[[File:Daszak shi 0 0.jpg|right|350px|thumb|[[Peter Daszak]] (right) toasting Shi Zhengli (left).]]

[[File:Daszak shi 0 0.jpg|right|350px|thumb|[[Peter Daszak]] (right) toasting Shi Zhengli (left).]]

:*[[Obama administration]] gives $3.7 million to Wuhan Institute of Virology.<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/taxpayer-funded-animal-experiments-tied-to-chinese-wet-markets-and-wuhan-laboratory</ref>

:*[[Obama administration]] gives $3.7 million to Wuhan Institute of Virology.<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/taxpayer-funded-animal-experiments-tied-to-chinese-wet-markets-and-wuhan-laboratory</ref>

:*Chinese military scientists discussed how to weaponize SARS coronaviruses to "cause the enemy’s medical system to collapse." In a 263-page document, written by People's Liberation Army scientists and senior Chinese public health officials and obtained by the US State Department during its investigation into the origins of COVID-19, suggests that SARS coronaviruses could herald a "new era of genetic weapons," and noted that they can be "artificially manipulated into an emerging human ­disease virus, then weaponized and unleashed in a way never seen before."<ref>https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/chinese-military-discussed-weaponizing-covid-2015-cause-enemys-medical-system-collapse</ref>

:*Chinese military scientists discussed how to weaponize SARS [[coronavirus]]es to "cause the enemy’s medical system to collapse." In a 263-page document, written by People's Liberation Army scientists and senior Chinese public health officials and obtained by the US State Department during its investigation into the origins of COVID-19, suggests that SARS coronaviruses could herald a "new era of genetic weapons," and noted that they can be "artificially manipulated into an emerging human ­disease virus, then weaponized and unleashed in a way never seen before."<ref>https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/chinese-military-discussed-weaponizing-covid-2015-cause-enemys-medical-system-collapse</ref>

:*November 2015 - Italian state-owned media company, ''Rai – Radiotelevisione Italiana'', broadcast a report about Chinese bioterror possibilities.<ref>https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/chinese-biological-experiments-infect-humans-coronavirus-exposed-2015-italian-state</ref>  The video demonstrated that Dr. Shi Zhengli and her researchers were studying a viral agent similar to coronavirus.<ref>https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151110115711.htm</ref> They had allegedly derived a SARS-connected virus from mice and bats in order to find out if it could be modified to affect humans. "It is a group of Chinese researchers attaching a protein taken from bats to the SARS virus, Acute Pneumonia, derived from mice. The output is a super coronavirus that could affect man. It remains closed in laboratories and it is only for study purposes, but is it worth the risk – creating such a great threat only for examination purposes?”<ref>https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/lab-made-coronavirus-triggers-debate-34502</ref>

:*November 2015 - Italian state-owned media company, ''Rai – Radiotelevisione Italiana'', broadcast a report about Chinese bioterror possibilities.<ref>https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/chinese-biological-experiments-infect-humans-coronavirus-exposed-2015-italian-state</ref>  The video demonstrated that Dr. Shi Zhengli and her researchers were studying a viral agent similar to coronavirus.<ref>https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151110115711.htm</ref> They had allegedly derived a SARS-connected virus from mice and bats in order to find out if it could be modified to affect humans. "It is a group of Chinese researchers attaching a protein taken from bats to the SARS virus, Acute Pneumonia, derived from mice. The output is a super coronavirus that could affect man. It remains closed in laboratories and it is only for study purposes, but is it worth the risk – creating such a great threat only for examination purposes?”<ref>https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/lab-made-coronavirus-triggers-debate-34502</ref>