SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
131
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + +
Added new controversy from my editing on Wikipedia - Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack article
===Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory article===
===Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory article===
The first major conflict on Wikipedia that Elijahandskip started was the creation of the Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory article. On October 14, 2020, Elijahandskip began a discussion on Wikipedia's 'Conspiracy theories related to the Trump–Ukraine scandal' article about splitting the Hunter Biden report from the New York Post. On October 15, with no opposes to the split, Elijahandskip 'Split' the Hunter Biden incident into an article titled "Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory".<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biden%E2%80%93Ukraine_conspiracy_theory&diff=1021778843&oldid=983695750</ref> After the move, all 'hell' broke loose. Multiple editors said Elijahandskip should never have moved the article in the first place. On October 16, Elijahandskip started a discussion that would end up lasting 30 days and be 25 pages long. The discussion was about "Discussing the term "False" in opening statement". The background of it was in the opening statement, the article said "The Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory is a series of false allegations". Conflict arose when the word 'false' was being removed, so the discussion attracted a lot of editors. The discussion ended up gaining so much attention that [[Breitbart News]] & Law Enforcement Today created articles about the entire incident.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/10/22/wikipedia-editors-label-biden-corruption-allegations-conspiracy-theory-after-censorship-attempts/</ref><ref>https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/hunter-biden-audio-tape-appears-to-confirm-business-dealings-with-spy-chief-of-china/</ref> In the end, the term "false" stayed in the article's first sentence.
The first major conflict on Wikipedia that Elijahandskip started was the creation of the Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory article. On October 14, 2020, Elijahandskip began a discussion on Wikipedia's 'Conspiracy theories related to the Trump–Ukraine scandal' article about splitting the Hunter Biden report from the New York Post. On October 15, with no opposes to the split, Elijahandskip 'Split' the Hunter Biden incident into an article titled "Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory".<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biden%E2%80%93Ukraine_conspiracy_theory&diff=1021778843&oldid=983695750</ref> After the move, all 'hell' broke loose. Multiple editors said Elijahandskip should never have moved the article in the first place. On October 16, Elijahandskip started a discussion that would end up lasting 30 days and be 25 pages long. The discussion was about "Discussing the term "False" in opening statement". The background of it was in the opening statement, the article said "The Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory is a series of false allegations". Conflict arose when the word 'false' was being removed, so the discussion attracted a lot of editors. The discussion ended up gaining so much attention that [[Breitbart News]] & Law Enforcement Today created articles about the entire incident.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/10/22/wikipedia-editors-label-biden-corruption-allegations-conspiracy-theory-after-censorship-attempts/</ref><ref>https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/hunter-biden-audio-tape-appears-to-confirm-business-dealings-with-spy-chief-of-china/</ref> In the end, the term "false" stayed in the article's first sentence.
===Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack article===
On May 7, the [[Colonial Pipeline cyberattack]] occurred and Elijahandskip created the article on [[Wikipedia]] for the cyberattack.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colonial_Pipeline_ransomware_attack&action=info</ref> On May 10, Wikipedia editor Fram went to Wikipedia admin Rosguill to report a violation of Elijahandskip's T-Ban by adding "and declared a state of emergency" after a sentence about President Biden in the article.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colonial_Pipeline_cyberattack&type=revision&diff=1022350338&oldid=1022311603</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Apologizing_for_a_T_ban_violation</ref> After a debate between Elijahandskip and Fram, Rosguill said "the diff that Fram provided is a clear cut violation of your tban". Elijahandskip received a 31 hour block from Wikipedia over the edit that added a total of 6 words to the article and in that edit, never mentioned anything about Post 1992 US Politics. However, on May 12, Elijahandskip got a notice about the article being mentioned on Wikipedia's "In The News" section on the main page.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Elijahandskip/Archive_2#ITN_recognition_for_Colonial_Pipeline_cyberattack</ref>
==History on Conservapedia==
==History on Conservapedia==