Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,925
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: − − == Young Earth Creationism View == − [[Young earth creationism|Young earth creationist]] scientists assert that [[materialism|materialistic]] explanations of the origin of stars are errant and contra-evidence and reports of stars forming are invalid. <ref>http://www.icr.org/article/403/</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i2/stars.asp</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences21.html</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/Docs/399.asp#55</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i1/feedback.asp</ref> In addition, creationists cite the secular scientific literature in order to make the case that materialist explanations of star formation are inadequate: − − − “We don’t understand how a single star forms, yet we want to understand how 10 billion stars form.” Carlos Frenk, as quoted by Robert Irion, “Surveys Scour the Cosmic Deep,” Science, Vol. 303, 19 March 2004, p. 1750. <ref>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/303/5665/1750</ref> − − − “Nobody really understands how star formation proceeds. It’s really remarkable.” Rogier A. Windhorst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell, “A Matter of Timing,” Scientific American, Vol. 267, October 1992, p. 30. <ref>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992SciAm.267Q..26P</ref>
→Young Earth Creationism View
The team hope to gain new experimental data and important clues about the hypothesized creation and evolution of the chemical elements shortly after the Big Bang. <ref> http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=5533 </ref>
The team hope to gain new experimental data and important clues about the hypothesized creation and evolution of the chemical elements shortly after the Big Bang. <ref> http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=5533 </ref>