Changes

==Identity politics==

==Identity politics==

Herbert Marcuse and [[Saul Alinsky]] introduced a more pragmatic, but also more virulent form of Marxism into [[academia| America academia]], facilitated this self-destruction by creating a new "[[proletariat]]" of "victim groups," the bedrock of [[identity politics]], pitting one gender against another, one race against another, one age group against another. In 1965, Marcuse and Alinsky introduced the concept of "partisan tolerance" into political parlance, which has mutated into the deadly pathogen called "political correctness"—a tolerance for [[evil]] and a stigmatization and ultimate persecution of righteousness and God's Laws.<ref>{{cite news |title= Commentary: Marxism in Academia: The Origins of Political Correctness |author=Maas, David F. |url = https://www.cgg.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Audio.details/ID/4939/Marxism-Academia-Origins-Political-Correctness.htm}}</ref>

Herbert Marcuse and [[Saul Alinsky]] introduced a more pragmatic, but also more virulent form of Marxism into [[academia| America academia]], facilitated this self-destruction by creating a new "[[proletariat]]" of "victim groups," the bedrock of [[identity politics]], pitting one gender against another, one race against another, one age group against another. In 1965, Marcuse and Alinsky introduced the concept of "partisan tolerance" into political parlance, which has mutated into the deadly pathogen called "political correctness"—a tolerance for [[evil]] and a stigmatization and ultimate persecution of righteousness and God's Laws.<ref>{{cite news |title= Commentary: Marxism in Academia: The Origins of Political Correctness |author=Maas, David F. |url = https://www.cgg.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Audio.details/ID/4939/Marxism-Academia-Origins-Political-Correctness.htm}}</ref><ref>https://www.cgg.org/index.cfm/library/commentary/id/4939/marxism-academia-origins-political-correctness.htm</ref>

According to Andrew Breitbart, unable to find a disgruntled proletariat, Marcuse found another dividing line that could be exploited to exacerbate social strife and dismantle societal structures—namely “victim groups,” the bedrock of [[identity politics]].  In ''An Essay on Liberation'', Marcuse's primary thesis was that potential revolutionaries such as university students, [[African Americans]], the ghetto populations, the alienated, the asocial, and the [[third world]] couldn't take the place of the proletariat, but were the "emergence of a new, spontaneous solidarity." <ref>{{cite book |author=Marcuse, Herbert |title=An Essay on Liberation |year=1969 |url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/marcuse/works/1969/essay-liberation.htm}}</ref>

According to Andrew Breitbart, unable to find a disgruntled proletariat, Marcuse found another dividing line that could be exploited to exacerbate social strife and dismantle societal structures—namely “victim groups,” the bedrock of [[identity politics]].  In ''An Essay on Liberation'', Marcuse's primary thesis was that potential revolutionaries such as university students, [[African Americans]], the ghetto populations, the alienated, the asocial, and the [[third world]] could<!--n't take the place of the proletariat, but were the "emergence of a new, spontaneous solidarity."--> <ref>{{cite book |author=Marcuse, Herbert |title=An Essay on Liberation |year=1969 |url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/marcuse/works/1969/essay-liberation.htm}}</ref>

Attempting to build a new proletariat to build a socialist [[revolution]] on, he preached that women are victimized by men. Creating a sense of exploitation, he stoked tension between white and nonwhite Americans, [[homosexual]] and [[heterosexual]], championing the downtrodden [[transgender]] population.  Breitbart maintained that Marcuse’s mission was “to dismantle American society by using [[diversity]] and ‘[[multiculturalism]]’ as crowbars with which to pry the structure apart, piece by piece.” Marcuse and Alinsky continually incorporated the best weapons to effect the assault on the structures of American society, maximizing the tension between victim and oppressor.

Attempting to build a new proletariat to build a socialist [[revolution]] on, he preached that women are victimized by men. Creating a sense of exploitation, he stoked tension between white and nonwhite Americans, [[homosexual]] and [[heterosexual]], championing the downtrodden [[transgender]] population.  Breitbart maintained that Marcuse’s mission was “to dismantle American society by using [[diversity]] and ‘[[multiculturalism]]’ as crowbars with which to pry the structure apart, piece by piece.” Marcuse and Alinsky continually incorporated the best weapons to effect the assault on the structures of American society, maximizing the tension between victim and oppressor.