Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
250 bytes added ,  08:20, July 22, 2021
Line 10: Line 10:     
Then in November, 2015, Shi and her team at the Wuhan virology lab once again published a paper.  This time in the British journal, ''Nature Medicine''.<ref>https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985</ref>  They discussed the creation of a synthetic virus, a self-replicating Chimeric virus.  This virus had the SARS virus as the framework, with the key S protein replaced, by the one they had found in a bat coronavirus, she mentioned in her 2013 paper.  This new virus demonstrated a powerful ability for cross-species infection.
 
Then in November, 2015, Shi and her team at the Wuhan virology lab once again published a paper.  This time in the British journal, ''Nature Medicine''.<ref>https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985</ref>  They discussed the creation of a synthetic virus, a self-replicating Chimeric virus.  This virus had the SARS virus as the framework, with the key S protein replaced, by the one they had found in a bat coronavirus, she mentioned in her 2013 paper.  This new virus demonstrated a powerful ability for cross-species infection.
−
 
+
{|class="infobox" style="float:right; font-size:85%; width:1ex; line-height:17px; margin: 0px 0px 5px 50px" cellpadding="1"
 +
|[[File:Shi Zhengli 2.PNG|208px]]
 +
|[[File:Ralph Baric.jpg|198px]]
 +
|-
 +
|colspan="3"|<hr/>Left:Shi Zhengli; Right:Ralph Baric.
 +
|}
 
The mice infected with the synthetic virus revealed severe lung damage with no cure.  This symbolized that Shi's successful splicing of the SARS virus, was a key to open the door to the cross-species transmission.  They planned to further experiment on [[primate]]s, although Shi Zhengli did not indicate any conclusion from this research.  Her move to research on primates wasn't done without controversy.  Shi's experiments quickly triggered widespread debates from the academic community.  Simon Wain-Hobson of the Pasteur Institute in [[France]], expressed deep concerns. He told ''Nature'', "If the new virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory.  Propagation could happen anywhere."<ref>https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/lab-made-coronavirus-triggers-debate-34502</ref>
 
The mice infected with the synthetic virus revealed severe lung damage with no cure.  This symbolized that Shi's successful splicing of the SARS virus, was a key to open the door to the cross-species transmission.  They planned to further experiment on [[primate]]s, although Shi Zhengli did not indicate any conclusion from this research.  Her move to research on primates wasn't done without controversy.  Shi's experiments quickly triggered widespread debates from the academic community.  Simon Wain-Hobson of the Pasteur Institute in [[France]], expressed deep concerns. He told ''Nature'', "If the new virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory.  Propagation could happen anywhere."<ref>https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/lab-made-coronavirus-triggers-debate-34502</ref>
  
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,509

edits

Navigation menu