SkipCaptcha
334
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + + + + + +
no edit summary
“We kind of thought, well, there’s no negatives to taking this,” said [a COVID patient]. “It’s not going to have any really bad side effects. If it could help, why not?”
“We kind of thought, well, there’s no negatives to taking this,” said [a COVID patient]. “It’s not going to have any really bad side effects. If it could help, why not?”
Within 24 hours, her fever was gone. After two days, Coutts felt completely herself again.<ref>https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.com/ivermectintestimonials.html</ref>}}
Within 24 hours, her fever was gone. After two days, Coutts felt completely herself again.<ref>https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.com/ivermectintestimonials.html</ref>}}
==Efficacy Questioned==
The efficacy of a drug being promoted for treating Covid-19 is in serious doubt after a major study suggesting the treatment is effective against the virus was withdrawn due to “ethical concerns”. <ref>https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-100956/v4</ref>
The preprint study on the efficacy and safety of ivermectin – a drug used against parasites such as worms and headlice – in treating Covid-19, led by Dr Ahmed Elgazzar from Benha University in Egypt, was published on the Research Square website in November. <ref>https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/jul/16/huge-study-supporting-ivermectin-as-covid-treatment-withdrawn-over-ethical-concerns</ref>
== See also ==
== See also ==