SkipCaptcha
334
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + + + +
Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (view source)
Revision as of 23:33, August 4, 2021
, 23:33, August 4, 2021no edit summary
== Peer Review ==
== Peer Review ==
Peer review confirming the results of the BEST study first appeared by December 2012 when published by Geoinformatics & Geostatistics: An Overview. <ref>http://static.berkeleyearth.org/papers/Results-Paper-Berkeley-Earth.pdf</ref> Numerous other reviews soon followed. <ref>https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/12/3469/2020/essd-12-3469-2020.html</ref> <ref>http://berkeleyearth.org/papers-climate-science/</ref>
Peer review confirming the results of the BEST study first appeared by December 2012 when published by Geoinformatics & Geostatistics: An Overview. <ref>http://static.berkeleyearth.org/papers/Results-Paper-Berkeley-Earth.pdf</ref> Numerous other reviews soon followed. <ref>https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/12/3469/2020/essd-12-3469-2020.html</ref> <ref>http://berkeleyearth.org/papers-climate-science/</ref>
== Skeptics View ==
Anthony Watts, a meteorologist prominent climate change skeptic, provided his own dataset for the study and stated: And, I’m prepared to accept whatever result they produce, even if it proves my premise wrong. I’m taking this bold step because the method has promise. <ref>https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/06/briggs-on-berkeleys-best-plus-my-thoughts-from-my-visit-there/</ref> But when the results came out, he changed his position and his website published numerous critiques against Muller and the BEST study. <ref>https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/01/pre-prints-and-pre-data/</ref>
Watts has received criticism for changing his view even after the results were peer reviewed. <ref>https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/10/23/watts-wrote-a-check-he-couldnt-cash/</ref>
== See also ==
== See also ==