679
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + +
Conservapedia:Should an encyclopedia simply present readers with the factual evidence on issues? (view source)
Revision as of 15:32, May 27, 2007
, 15:32, May 27, 2007→NO
::On this site, the problem is keeping the facts on the page--the worst enemy of truth is the zealot, and this place seems to have a surplus of zealots with over-active 'delete' keys. --[[User:Ghoti|Ghoti]] 20:01, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
::On this site, the problem is keeping the facts on the page--the worst enemy of truth is the zealot, and this place seems to have a surplus of zealots with over-active 'delete' keys. --[[User:Ghoti|Ghoti]] 20:01, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
::::"The Puritans rejected slavery" was precisely what Andrew Schlafley told us in his American History Lecture, which, even after the truth was pointed out, still contrives to give students the impression that the Massachussetts Bay Colony, the primary trader of slaves in the colonies during the 17th Century, opposed slavery. It is not merely a "conclusion" that Chase Smith's "Declaration of Conscience" was an attack on McCarthy and McCarthyism. That's exactly what it was, and was recognized as such at the time. Have you even bothered to read it, or the history around it? And claiming, as one person has, that the Democratic Party opposed the 1965 Voting Rights Act is an outright lie, a deliberate attempt to conflate one wing of the party, the Southern Democrats, as is the claim in another article (now locked to prevent any corrections) that Lenin coined the term "concentration camp."
::::Yes, indeed, the worst enemy of truth is the zealot, and assertions like the ones I've cited prove it. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 11:32, 27 May 2007 (EDT)