Changes

*''Am. Ins. Ass’n v. Garamendi'', 539 U.S. 396, 401, 424 (2003) (cited by the government in support of open borders, but actually the decision never mentions immigration.  It invalidated California's Holocaust Victim Insurance Relief Act of 1999 for supposedly interfering with the national government's conduct of foreign relations.)

*''Am. Ins. Ass’n v. Garamendi'', 539 U.S. 396, 401, 424 (2003) (cited by the government in support of open borders, but actually the decision never mentions immigration.  It invalidated California's Holocaust Victim Insurance Relief Act of 1999 for supposedly interfering with the national government's conduct of foreign relations.)

*''Crosby v. Nat’l Foreign Trade Council'', 530 U.S. 363, 381 (2000).

*''Crosby v. Nat’l Foreign Trade Council'', 530 U.S. 363, 373, 381 (2000) (cited by the government for the doctrine of “obstacle preemption,” which inquires whether a state regulation poses “a sufficient obstacle is a matter of judgment, to be informed by examining the federal statute as a whole and identifying its purpose and intended effects”)

[[category:immigration]]

[[category:immigration]]