Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
There is still some "reasonable doubt" out there - see User talk:Aschlafly#Conservapedia Insights
Line 1: Line 1:  
This is a growing list of '''Conservapedia insights''', which includes items recognized or emphasized here well before recognition by an official agency, by [[liberals]], or by the general public:
 
This is a growing list of '''Conservapedia insights''', which includes items recognized or emphasized here well before recognition by an official agency, by [[liberals]], or by the general public:
   −
#Conservapedia was the first to boldly declare that [[pi]] contains [[pi]], despite [[liberal denial]] of the breadth and power of [[infinity]].
+
<!--#Conservapedia was the first to boldly declare that [[pi]] contains [[pi]], despite [[liberal denial]] of the breadth and power of [[infinity]].-->
−
#There have been 92 (and growing) controversial predictions by Conservapedia which have proven to be true.  ''See [[Conservapedia proven right]]''.
+
#There have been 91 (and growing) controversial predictions by Conservapedia which have proven to be true.  ''See [[Conservapedia proven right]]''.
 
#Conservapedia observed the likelihood that [[Jesus]] wrote the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] -- ''see'' [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]
 
#Conservapedia observed the likelihood that [[Jesus]] wrote the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] -- ''see'' [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]
 
#Conservapedia observed that "[[Son of Man]]" is a [[liberal]] mistranslation to downplay the divinity of [[Jesus]], and that a stronger, more precise translation would be "The Son as Man" or "The Son, a Man."
 
#Conservapedia observed that "[[Son of Man]]" is a [[liberal]] mistranslation to downplay the divinity of [[Jesus]], and that a stronger, more precise translation would be "The Son as Man" or "The Son, a Man."
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu